ArticleFrontiers in radiology2021
Brain Tumor Segmentation From Multi-Modal MR Images via Ensembling UNets.
Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-modal direct LINAC parameter prediction for pancreatic VMAT: An optimization-free approach.Medical physics · 2026Article
- RadGLO: an interactive platform for radiomic feature analysis and prognostic modeling in glioma.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Deep learning-driven modality imputation and subregion segmentation to enhance high-grade glioma grading.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Exploring the Impact of Variability in Cell Segmentation and Tracking Approaches.Microscopy research and technique · 2025Article
- Brain tumor segmentation using deep learning: high performance with minimized MRI data.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Article
- Exploring Multi-Pathology Brain Segmentation: From Volume-Based to Component-Based Deep Learning Analysis.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
- Robust AI-Driven Segmentation of Glioblastoma T1c and FLAIR MRI Series and the Low Variability of the MRIMath© Smart Manual Contouring Platform.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Cascade Residual Multiscale Convolution and Mamba-Structured UNet for Advanced Brain Tumor Image Segmentation.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Deep learning-assisted radiomics facilitates multimodal prognostication for personalized treatment strategies in low-grade glioma.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A state-of-the-art technique to perform cloud-based semantic segmentation using deep learning 3D U-Net architecture.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Review
- FetalGAN: Automated Segmentation of Fetal Functional Brain MRI Using Deep Generative Adversarial Learning and Multi-Scale 3D U-Net.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Image-Based Segmentation of Brain Tumor Using the Modified Transfer Learning Method.Journal of medical physicsArticle
- Diagnosing growth in low-grade gliomas with and without artificial intelligence-measured longitudinal volume measurements: A retrospective observational study.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioma is a type of severe brain tumor, and its accurate segmentation is useful in surgery planning and progression evaluation. Based on different biological properties, the glioma can be divided into three partially-overlapping regions of interest, including whole tumor (WT), tumor core (TC), and enhancing tumor (ET). Recently, UNet has identified its effectiveness in automatically segmenting brain tumor from multi-modal magnetic resonance (MR) images. In this work, instead of network architecture, we focus on making use of prior knowledge (brain parcellation), training and testing strategy (joint 3D+2D), ensemble and post-processing to improve the brain tumor segmentation performance. We explore the accuracy of three UNets with different inputs, and then ensemble the corresponding three outputs, followed by post-processing to achieve the final segmentation. Similar to most existing works, the first UNet uses 3D patches of multi-modal MR images as the input. The second UNet uses brain parcellation as an additional input. And the third UNet is inputted by 2D slices of multi-modal MR images, brain parcellation, and probability maps of WT, TC, and ET obtained from the second UNet. Then, we sequentially unify the WT segmentation from the third UNet and the fused TC and ET segmentation from the first and the second UNets as the complete tumor segmentation. Finally, we adopt a post-processing strategy by labeling small ET as non-enhancing tumor to correct some false-positive ET segmentation. On one publicly-available challenge validation dataset (BraTS2018), the proposed segmentation pipeline yielded average Dice scores of 91.03/86.44/80.58% and average 95% Hausdorff distances of 3.76/6.73/2.51 mm for WT/TC/ET, exhibiting superior segmentation performance over other state-of-the-art methods. We then evaluated the proposed method on the BraTS2020 training data through five-fold cross validation, with similar performance having also been observed. The proposed method was finally evaluated on 10 in-house data, the effectiveness of which has been established qualitatively by professional radiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.