Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37492172›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in radiology2021

Brain Tumor Segmentation From Multi-Modal MR Images via Ensembling UNets.

Yue Zhang, Pinyuan Zhong, Dabin Jie, Jiewei Wu, Shanmei Zeng, Jianping Chu, Yilong Liu, Ed X Wu, Xiaoying Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yue ZhangDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Pinyuan ZhongDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Dabin JieDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Jiewei WuSchool of Electronics and Information Technology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Shanmei ZengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianping ChuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yilong LiuLaboratory of Biomedical Imaging and Signal Processing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ed X WuLaboratory of Biomedical Imaging and Signal Processing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Xiaoying TangDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioma is a type of severe brain tumor, and its accurate segmentation is useful in surgery planning and progression evaluation. Based on different biological properties, the glioma can be divided into three partially-overlapping regions of interest, including whole tumor (WT), tumor core (TC), and enhancing tumor (ET). Recently, UNet has identified its effectiveness in automatically segmenting brain tumor from multi-modal magnetic resonance (MR) images. In this work, instead of network architecture, we focus on making use of prior knowledge (brain parcellation), training and testing strategy (joint 3D+2D), ensemble and post-processing to improve the brain tumor segmentation performance. We explore the accuracy of three UNets with different inputs, and then ensemble the corresponding three outputs, followed by post-processing to achieve the final segmentation. Similar to most existing works, the first UNet uses 3D patches of multi-modal MR images as the input. The second UNet uses brain parcellation as an additional input. And the third UNet is inputted by 2D slices of multi-modal MR images, brain parcellation, and probability maps of WT, TC, and ET obtained from the second UNet. Then, we sequentially unify the WT segmentation from the third UNet and the fused TC and ET segmentation from the first and the second UNets as the complete tumor segmentation. Finally, we adopt a post-processing strategy by labeling small ET as non-enhancing tumor to correct some false-positive ET segmentation. On one publicly-available challenge validation dataset (BraTS2018), the proposed segmentation pipeline yielded average Dice scores of 91.03/86.44/80.58% and average 95% Hausdorff distances of 3.76/6.73/2.51 mm for WT/TC/ET, exhibiting superior segmentation performance over other state-of-the-art methods. We then evaluated the proposed method on the BraTS2020 training data through five-fold cross validation, with similar performance having also been observed. The proposed method was finally evaluated on 10 in-house data, the effectiveness of which has been established qualitatively by professional radiologists.

Indexed as

brain parcellationbrain tumorensemblesegmentationUNet

Identifiers

PMID37492172
PMCPMC10365098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.