Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37492169›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in radiology2021

A Case-Based Review of Cerebral Venous Infarcts With Perfusion Imaging and Comparison to Arterial Ischemic Stroke.

Anna Y Li, Elizabeth Tong, Vivek S Yedavalli

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Imaging of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna Y LiDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
Elizabeth TongDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
Vivek S YedavalliDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
Stanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) and cerebral venous infarcts (CVI) are diagnostic dilemmas secondary to their rarity, non-specific symptomatology at presentation, and variable imaging features. Despite its relatively infrequence, CVT is particularly prevalent in the younger adult population and is a potentially life-threatening disease with devastating neurological complications if not addressed in a timely manner. However, when treated promptly, CVT has the potential for a more reversible course and favorable prognosis than arterial ischemic strokes (AIS). The pathophysiology of CVI is distinct from that of AIS and is closely related to its potentially reversible nature. Familiarity with the conventional and variant venous anatomy, as well as the temporal evolution of imaging findings, is crucial in establishing diagnostic confidence. The use of MR perfusion imaging (MRP) and arterial spin-labeling (ASL) can potentially aid in the diagnosis of CVT/CVI

Indexed as

cerebral venous infarction (CVI)cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT)CTVMR venography (MRV)perfusion imaging

Identifiers

PMID37492169
PMCPMC10365275
OpenAlexW3205869923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.