Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37492164›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in radiology2021

Characterisation of Children's Head Motion for Magnetic Resonance Imaging With and Without General Anaesthesia.

Hannah Eichhorn, Andreea-Veronica Vascan, Martin Nørgaard, Andreas H Ellegaard, Jakob M Slipsager, Sune Høgild Keller, Lisbeth Marner, Melanie Ganz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hannah EichhornNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andreea-Veronica VascanNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Martin NørgaardNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andreas H EllegaardTracInnovations, Ballerup, Denmark.
Jakob M SlipsagerTracInnovations, Ballerup, Denmark.
Sune Høgild KellerDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lisbeth MarnerDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Melanie GanzNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKRigshospitalet · DKStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head motion is one of the major reasons for artefacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), which is especially challenging for children who are often intimidated by the dimensions of the MR scanner. In order to optimise the MRI acquisition for children in the clinical setting, insights into children's motion patterns are essential. In this work, we analyse motion data from 61 paediatric patients. We compare structural MRI data of children imaged with and without general anaesthesia (GA), all scanned using the same hybrid PET/MR scanner. We analyse several metrics of motion based on the displacement relative to a reference, decompose the transformation matrix into translation and rotation, as well as investigate whether different regions in the brain are affected differently by the children's motion. Head motion for children without GA was significantly higher, with a median of the mean displacements of 2.19 ± 0.93 mm (median ± standard deviation) during 41.7±7.5 min scans; however, even anaesthetised children showed residual head motion (mean displacement of 1.12±0.35 mm). For both patient groups translation along the z-axis (along the scanner bore) was significantly larger in absolute terms (GA / no GA: 0.87±0.29/0.92 ± 0.49 mm) compared to the other directions. Considering directionality, both patient groups were moving in negative z-direction and thus, out of the scanner. The awake children additionally showed significantly more nodding rotation (0.33±0.20°). In future studies as well as in the clinical setting, these predominant types of motion need to be taken into consideration to limit artefacts and reduce re-scans due to poor image quality.

Indexed as

anaesthesiabrainmagnetic resonance imagingmotion artefactmotion patternspediatric radiology

Identifiers

PMID37492164
PMCPMC10365093
OpenAlexW4226341051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.