ArticleFrontiers in radiology2021
Characterisation of Children's Head Motion for Magnetic Resonance Imaging With and Without General Anaesthesia.
Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- A dataset of clinical pediatric brain MRI with and without motion correction.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Brain MRI Dataset Featuring a Full Clinical Protocol With and Without Intentional Motion.Scientific data · 2026Article
- An Exploration of Motion-Sampling Interactions in 3D MRI for Neuroimaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- A network-assisted joint image and motion estimation approach for robust 3D MRI motion correction across severity levels.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Feasibility of single-shot multi-slice DENSE MRI at 7 T for strain tensor imaging in a paediatric population.Interface focus · 2025Article
- A neural network to create super-resolution MR from multiple 2D brain scans of pediatric patients.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Awake pediatric brain-MRI: a fast multi-sequence scan augmented with motion compensated single-shot 2D acquisitions.Radiology advances · 2024Article
- Examining the reliability of brain age algorithms under varying degrees of participant motion.Brain informatics · 2024Article
- A radiofrequency coil for infants and toddlers.NMR in biomedicine · 2023Article
- A numerical human brain phantom for dynamic glucose-enhanced (DGE) MRI: On the influence of head motion at 3T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Movement-related artefacts (MR-ART) dataset of matched motion-corrupted and clean structural MRI brain scans.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Characterisation of Children's Head Motion for Magnetic Resonance Imaging With and Without General Anaesthesia.Frontiers in radiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Head motion is one of the major reasons for artefacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), which is especially challenging for children who are often intimidated by the dimensions of the MR scanner. In order to optimise the MRI acquisition for children in the clinical setting, insights into children's motion patterns are essential. In this work, we analyse motion data from 61 paediatric patients. We compare structural MRI data of children imaged with and without general anaesthesia (GA), all scanned using the same hybrid PET/MR scanner. We analyse several metrics of motion based on the displacement relative to a reference, decompose the transformation matrix into translation and rotation, as well as investigate whether different regions in the brain are affected differently by the children's motion. Head motion for children without GA was significantly higher, with a median of the mean displacements of 2.19 ± 0.93 mm (median ± standard deviation) during 41.7±7.5 min scans; however, even anaesthetised children showed residual head motion (mean displacement of 1.12±0.35 mm). For both patient groups translation along the z-axis (along the scanner bore) was significantly larger in absolute terms (GA / no GA: 0.87±0.29/0.92 ± 0.49 mm) compared to the other directions. Considering directionality, both patient groups were moving in negative z-direction and thus, out of the scanner. The awake children additionally showed significantly more nodding rotation (0.33±0.20°). In future studies as well as in the clinical setting, these predominant types of motion need to be taken into consideration to limit artefacts and reduce re-scans due to poor image quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.