Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37492104›Full record

ArticleCell genomics2023

Multi-layered genetic approaches to identify approved drug targets.

Marie C Sadler, Chiara Auwerx, Patrick Deelen, Zoltán Kutalik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genome-scale perturbation signatures from primary human CD4bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Leveraging the genetics of psychiatric disorders to prioritize potential drug targets and compounds.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genetic associations in sepsis and ARDS.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marie C SadlerUniversity Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Route de Berne 113, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Chiara AuwerxUniversity Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Route de Berne 113, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Patrick DeelenDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, 9700 Groningen, the Netherlands.
Zoltán KutalikUniversity Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Route de Berne 113, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drugs targeting genes linked to disease via evidence from human genetics have increased odds of approval. Approaches to prioritize such genes include genome-wide association studies (GWASs), rare variant burden tests in exome sequencing studies (Exome), or integration of a GWAS with expression/protein quantitative trait loci (eQTL/pQTL-GWAS). Here, we compare gene-prioritization approaches on 30 clinically relevant traits and benchmark their ability to recover drug targets. Across traits, prioritized genes were enriched for drug targets with odds ratios (ORs) of 2.17, 2.04, 1.81, and 1.31 for the GWAS, eQTL-GWAS, Exome, and pQTL-GWAS methods, respectively. Adjusting for differences in testable genes and sample sizes, GWAS outperforms e/pQTL-GWAS, but not the Exome approach. Furthermore, performance increased through gene network diffusion, although the node degree, being the best predictor (OR = 8.7), revealed strong bias in literature-curated networks. In conclusion, we systematically assessed strategies to prioritize drug target genes, highlighting the promises and pitfalls of current approaches.

Indexed as

drug target discoveryeQTLExomegene prioritizationGWASnetwork diffusionpQTL

Identifiers

PMID37492104
PMCPMC10363916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.