Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37492014›Full record

ReviewCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2023

Mapping between cognitive theories and psycho-physiological models of attention system performance.

Oliver A Guidetti, Craig P Speelman, Peter Bouhlas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oliver A GuidettiWestern Australian Department of the Premier and Cabinet, The Cyber Security Research Cooperative, Edith Cowan University, Building 30, 270 Joondalup Dr, Joondalup, Western Australia 6027, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4235-4259
Craig P SpeelmanDepartment of Psychology, Edith Cowan University, Building 30, 270 Joondalup Dr, Joondalup, Western Australia 6027, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8629-174X
Peter BouhlasWestern Australian Department of the Premier and Cabinet, Dumas House, 2 Havelock St, West Perth, Western Australia 6005, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Declines in the capacity to sustain attention to repetitive, monotonous tasks is a phenomenon known as vigilance decrement (Endsley M, Kiris E. The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. 1995. Hum Factors. 37:32-64). This review compares cognitive theories with psycho-physiological models of vigilance decrement, and a gap is identified in mapping between the 2. That is, theories of vigilance decrement refer to "cognitive" resources; by contrast, psychophysiological models of the cerebral systems associated with attention explain performance functions according to neurochemical resources. A map does not currently exist in the literature that bridges the gap between cognitive theories of vigilance decrement and psychophysiological models of the human attention system. The link between "cognitive resource" theories of vigilance decrement and the psychophysiological models of attention performance is a gap in the literature that this review fills. This comprehensive review provides an expanded psychophysiological understanding of vigilance decrement that could help inform the management of declines in sustained attention capacity in operational settings. In addition, elucidating the link between cognitive theories of vigilance decrement and psychophysiological models of the human attention system might be used to treat and better understand pathologies such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Indexed as

PsychophysiologyWakefulnessHumansReaction Timecognitive resourcespsycho-physiological resourcessustained attentionvigilance

Identifiers

PMID37492014
PMCPMC10502801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.