ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2023
Temporal characteristics of gamma rhythm constrain properties of noise in an inhibition-stabilized network model.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delayed Accumulation of Inhibitory Input Explains Gamma Frequency Variation with Changing Contrast in an Inhibition Stabilized Network.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Burst estimation through atomic decomposition (BEAD): A toolbox to find oscillatory bursts in brain signals.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gamma rhythm refers to oscillatory neural activity between 30 and 80 Hz, induced in visual cortex by stimuli such as iso-luminant hues or gratings. The power and peak frequency of gamma depend on the properties of the stimulus such as size and contrast. Gamma waveform is typically arch-shaped, with narrow troughs and broad peaks, and can be replicated in a self-oscillating Wilson-Cowan (WC) model operating in an appropriate regime. However, oscillations in this model are infinitely long, unlike physiological gamma that occurs in short bursts. Further, unlike the model, gamma is faster after stimulus onset and slows down over time. Here, we first characterized gamma burst duration in local field potential data recorded from two monkeys as they viewed full screen iso-luminant hues. We then added different types of noise in the inputs to the WC model and tested how that affected duration and temporal dynamics of gamma. While the model failed with the often-used Poisson noise, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck noise applied to both the excitatory and the inhibitory populations replicated the duration and slowing of gamma and replicated the shape and stimulus dependencies. Thus, the temporal dynamics of gamma oscillations put constraints on the type and properties of underlying neural noise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.