Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37491965›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2023

When perfection isn't enough: host egg signatures are an effective defence against high-fidelity African cuckoo mimicry.

Jess Lund, Tanmay Dixit, Mairenn C Attwood, Silky Hamama, Collins Moya, Martin Stevens, Gabriel A Jamie, Claire N Spottiswoode

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jess LundDST-NRF Centre of Excellence at the FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9618-9730
Tanmay DixitDST-NRF Centre of Excellence at the FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5604-7965
Mairenn C AttwoodDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5386-1291
Silky HamamaMusumanene Farm, Choma, Zambia.
Collins MoyaMusumanene Farm, Choma, Zambia.
Martin StevensCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7768-3426
Gabriel A JamieDST-NRF Centre of Excellence at the FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2766-7687
Claire N SpottiswoodeDST-NRF Centre of Excellence at the FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-3232-9559
University of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J014109/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most mimicry systems involve imperfect mimicry, whereas perfect and high-fidelity mimicry are rare. When the fidelity of mimicry is high, mimics might be expected to have the upper hand against their antagonists. However, in coevolving systems, diversification of model phenotypes may provide an evolutionary escape, because mimics cannot simultaneously match all model individuals in the population. Here we investigate high-fidelity mimicry in a highly specialized, Afrotropical brood parasite-host system: the African cuckoo and fork-tailed drongo. Specifically, we test whether host egg polymorphisms are an effective defence against such mimicry. We show, using a combination of image analysis, field experiments and simulations, that: (1) egg colour and pattern mimicry of fork-tailed drongo eggs by African cuckoos is near-perfect on average; (2) drongos show fine-tuned rejection of foreign eggs, exploiting unpredictable pattern differences between parasitic eggs and their own; and (3) the high degree of interclutch variation (polymorphic egg 'signatures') exhibited by drongos gives them the upper hand in the arms race, with 93.7% of cuckoo eggs predicted to be rejected, despite cuckoos mimicking the full range of drongo egg phenotypes. These results demonstrate that model diversification is a highly effective defence against mimics, even when mimicry is highly accurate.

Indexed as

ParasitesPasseriformesAnimalsBiological EvolutionHost-Parasite InteractionsNesting BehaviorOvumPhenotypeavian brood parasitismcoevolutionegg signaturesperfect mimicry

Identifiers

PMID37491965
PMCPMC10369021
OpenAlexW4385264576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.