Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37491651›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research and treatment2023

Effects of letrozole on serum estradiol and estrone in postmenopausal breast cancer patients and tolerability of treatment: a prospective trial using a highly sensitive LC-MS/MS (liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry) method for estrogen measurement.

Mária Faltinová, Leena Vehmanen, Heli Lyytinen, Mikko Haanpää, Esa Hämäläinen, Aila Tiitinen, Carl Blomqvist, Johanna Mattson

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Sexual health among patients with breast cancer undergoing endocrine therapy: an integrative review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mária FaltinováComprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 180, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0749-2955
Leena VehmanenComprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 180, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.
Heli LyytinenUniversity of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Mikko HaanpääHUSLAB, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Esa HämäläinenUniversity of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Aila TiitinenUniversity of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Carl BlomqvistComprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 180, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.
Johanna MattsonComprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 180, 00290, Helsinki, Finland. johanna.mattson@hus.fi.
University of Helsinki · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze serum estradiol (E2) and estrone (E1) during letrozole treatment and their association to Quality of Life (QoL) and side-effects.

methodsPostmenopausal breast cancer patients starting adjuvant letrozole were eligible. Serum samples were taken at baseline, three, and 12 months. E2 and FSH were measured with routine chemiluminescent immunoassays. E2 and E1 were analyzed after trial completion with a highly sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method (LC-MS/MS) with lower limits of quantification (LLOQ) of 5 pmol/L. QoL was measured at baseline and at 12 months with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 and the Women's Health questionnaires, and menopause-related symptoms with the modified Kupperman Index.

resultsOf 100 screened patients 90 completed the trial. Baseline mean LC-MS/MS E2 and E1 were 12 pmol/L (range < 5-57) and 66 pmol/L (< 5-226), respectively. E2 levels measured by immunoassay and LC-MS/MS showed no correlation. E2 and E1 were completely suppressed by letrozole except for one occasion (E1 11 pmol/L at 3 months). Pain, side effects of systemic therapy, vasomotor symptoms, joint and muscle aches, and vaginal dryness increased during letrozole treatment. A high baseline E2 was significantly associated with increased aching joints and muscles, but not with the other side effects.

conclusionsLetrozole supresses E2 and E1 completely below the LLOQ of the LC-MS/MS in postmenopausal women. High pre-treatment E2 levels were associated with more joint and muscle pain during letrozole. Automated immunoassays are unsuitable for E2 monitoring during letrozole therapy due to poor sensitivity.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEstroneChromatography, LiquidEstradiolEstrogensFemaleHumansLetrozolePostmenopauseProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTandem Mass SpectrometryEstradiolEstrogensEstroneLetrozoleAromatase inhibitorBreast cancerEstradiolLetrozoleLiquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometryQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID37491651
PMCPMC10460747
OpenAlexW4385237383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.