Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37491633›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2023

Using a picture (or a thousand words) for supporting spatial knowledge of a complex virtual environment.

Allison J Jaeger, Steven M Weisberg, Alina Nazareth, Nora S Newcombe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Probing mental representations of space through sketch mapping: a scoping review.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Allison J JaegerDepartment of Psychology, Mississippi State University, P.O. Box 6161, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, USA. ajb1193@msstate.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6238-8923
Steven M WeisbergUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7003-6082
Alina NazarethTemple University, Philadelphia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1045-6760
Nora S NewcombeTemple University, Philadelphia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7044-6046

Funding

Critical Life Event Support for K01 NIA AwardeeK01AG070333 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI WEISBERG, STEVEN M · 2021 to 2025
$694k
Volumetric and connectivity measures of navigation and memory skill acquisitionR21NS120237 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI EKSTROM, ARNE D, WEISBERG, STEVEN M · 2020 to 2020
$434k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG070333NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS120237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

External representations powerfully support and augment complex human behavior. When navigating, people often consult external representations to help them find the way to go, but do maps or verbal instructions improve spatial knowledge or support effective wayfinding? Here, we examine spatial knowledge with and without external representations in two studies where participants learn a complex virtual environment. In the first study, we asked participants to generate their own maps or verbal instructions, partway through learning. We found no evidence of improved spatial knowledge in a pointing task requiring participants to infer the direction between two targets, either on the same route or on different routes, and no differences between groups in accurately recreating a map of the target landmarks. However, as a methodological note, pointing was correlated with the accuracy of the maps that participants drew. In the second study, participants had access to an accurate map or set of verbal instructions that they could study while learning the layout of target landmarks. Again, we found no evidence of differentially improved spatial knowledge in the pointing task, although we did find that the map group could recreate a map of the target landmarks more accurately. However, overall improvement was high. There was evidence that the nature of improvement across all conditions was specific to initial navigation ability levels. Our findings add to a mixed literature on the role of external representations for navigation and suggest that more substantial intervention-more scaffolding, explicit training, enhanced visualization, perhaps with personalized sequencing-may be necessary to improve navigation ability.

Indexed as

LearningSpatial LearningHumansExternal representationsSketch mapsSpatial cognitionVirtual navigation

Identifiers

PMID37491633
PMCPMC10368603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.