Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37491619›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2023

The effect of non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation on the duration of non-invasive respiratory support in late preterm and term infants with transient tachypnea of the newborn: a randomized controlled trial.

Emre Baldan, Ipek Guney Varal, Pelin Dogan, Mehmet N Cizmeci

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03006354 (Nasal High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Late-Preterm and Term Infants With Transient Tachypnea of the Newborn), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03006354 nacompletednot on this map

Nasal High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Late-Preterm and Term Infants With Transient Tachypnea of the Newborn: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenRan2017 to 2018Enrolled60ConditionsTransient Tachypnea of the NewbornArmsnHFOV, nCPAP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Transient tachypnoea: new concepts on the commonest neonatal respiratory disorder.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Emre BaldanDepartment of Pediatrics, Dortcelik Children's Hospital, Bursa, Turkey. dremrebaldan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2305-870X
Ipek Guney VaralDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Health Sciences, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Teaching Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3298-066X
Pelin DoganDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Health Sciences, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Teaching Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4926-7657
Mehmet N CizmeciDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Health Sciences, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Teaching Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6807-4266
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRGaziantep Children's Hospital · TRUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is one of the most commonly used non-invasive respiratory support modes in neonates with transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN). Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) is a non-invasive respiratory support mode that has been increasingly used in neonatal respiratory disorders. This prospective randomized controlled study compared the efficacy of nHFOV and nCPAP in reducing the duration of non-invasive respiratory support. Late preterm and term infants > 34 weeks' gestation were included in the study. The infants were randomly assigned to receive either nHFOV or nCPAP. Treatment was started with standard settings in both groups. Infants who met treatment failure criteria were switched to nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation for further positive-pressure support. A total of 60 infants were included in the study. Thirty of these infants were included in the nHFOV group and 30 were included in the nCPAP group. The median duration of non-invasive respiratory support was not significantly different between the two groups (21 h [IQR: 16-68] for nHFOV vs 15 h [IQR: 11-33] for nCPAP; p = 0.09). However, after adjusting for potential confounders, nHFOV was associated with a shorter duration of non-invasive respiratory support than nCPAP (adjusted mean difference: 16.3 h; 95% CI: 0.7 to 31.9; p = 0.04). nHFOV was well tolerated and did not increase the risk of complications.    Conclusion: Our findings suggest that nHFOV is an effective and safe ventilation mode for late preterm and term neonates with TTN.   Trial registry: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03006354). Date of registration: December 30, 2016. What is Known: • nHFOV is a ventilation model that has been increasingly used for the management of RDS. • TTN is one of the most common causes of neonatal respiratory distress. What is New: • nHFOV is associated with shorter duration of non-invasive respiratory support and duration of oxygen support. • nHFOV may be a safe and effective alternative to nCPAP for neonates with TTN.

Indexed as

High-Frequency VentilationNoninvasive VentilationRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornTransient Tachypnea of the NewbornContinuous Positive Airway PressureHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntermittent Positive-Pressure VentilationProspective StudiesHigh-frequency oscillatory ventilationNasal continuous positive airway pressureNewbornTransient tachypnea of the newborn

Identifiers

PMID37491619
OpenAlexW4385235316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.