Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37491608›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord2023

The international spinal cord injury pain basic data set (version 3.0).

Eva Widerström-Noga, Fin Biering-Sørensen, Thomas N Bryce, Diana D Cardenas, Nanna B Finnerup, Mark P Jensen, J Scott Richards, Jan Rosner, Julian Taylor

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07165353 (Virtual Walking With Habitual Feedback to Reduce Chronic Neuropathic Pain in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07165353 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Virtual Walking With Habitual Feedback to Reduce Chronic Neuropathic Pain in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorSwiss Paraplegic Research, NottwilRan2026 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries (SCI), Neuropathic Pain Due to Spinal Cord InjuryArmsVirtual Walking, Sham Virtual Walking
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Neuropathic Pain-Like Responses in a Chronic CNS Injury Model Are Mediated by Corticospinal-Targeted Spinal Interneurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. The meaning of manageable neuropathic pain after SCI.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eva Widerström-NogaMiami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. ewiderstrom-noga@med.miami.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0208-3658
Fin Biering-SørensenDepartment for Brain and Spinal Cord Injuries, Rigshospitalet, and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2186-0144
Thomas N BryceDepartment of Rehabilitation and Human Performance, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Diana D CardenasDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Nanna B FinnerupDanish Pain Research Center, Department of Clinical medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5541-0240
Mark P JensenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Scott RichardsDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Jan RosnerSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1973-1773
Julian TaylorSensorimotor Function Group, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos, Servicio de Salud Castilla-La Mancha (SESCAM), Toledo, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2553-2348

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designExpert opinion, feedback, revisions, and final consensus.

objectivesTo update the International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set (ISCIPBDS version 2.0) and incorporate suggestions from the SCI pain clinical and research community with respect to overall utility.

settingInternational.

methodsThe ISCIPBDS working group evaluated these suggestions and made modifications. The revised ISCIPBDS (Version 3.0) was then reviewed by members of the International SCI Data Sets Committee, the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Board, the International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS) Executive and Scientific Committees, individual reviewers and societies, and posted on the ASIA and ISCoS websites for 1 month to elicit comments before final approval by ASIA and ISCoS.

resultsThe ISCIPBDS (Version 3.0) was updated to make the dataset more flexible and useful: 1. The assessment can be based on the patient's perception of several of his/her "worst" pain(s) or based on the International SCI Pain (ISCIP) Classification-defined or other pain types, depending on the specific research questions or clinical needs. 2. Pain interference should usually be rated for overall pain but may also be used for specific pain problems if needed. 3. An optional pain drawing was added to complement the check box documentation of pain location. 4. Data categories consistent with the Extended Pain Dataset list of current treatments were added. 5. Several new training cases were added.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMalePainUnited States

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.