Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37491559›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Ergonomic guidelines for the design interfaces of additive modules for manual wheelchairs: sagittal plane.

Bartosz Wieczorek, Mateusz Kukla, Łukasz Warguła, Marcin Giedrowicz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bartosz WieczorekFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Piotrowo 3 St., 424 BM, 61-139, Poznan, Poland. bartosz.wieczorek@put.poznan.pl.
Mateusz KuklaFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Piotrowo 3 St., 424 BM, 61-139, Poznan, Poland.
Łukasz WargułaFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Piotrowo 3 St., 424 BM, 61-139, Poznan, Poland.
Marcin GiedrowiczFaculty of Architecture, Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland.
Poznań University of Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When designing wheelchair propulsion systems operated with the upper limb, there is a noticeable lack of ergonomic analyses informing about the areas on the wheelchair frame where hand-operated controls can be installed. With that in mind, a research goal was set to measure the areas of human hand reach within the area defined by the structural elements of a manual wheelchair. An ergonomic analysis was performed on a group of ten patients representing 50% of anthropometric dimensions. Motion capture and image analysis software based on the openCV library were used for the measurement. The conducted research resulted in the development of a map of the hands range in the lateral plane of the wheelchair, parallel to the sagittal plane. In addition, the map was divided into three zones of hand reach, taking into account various levels of comfort of hand manipulation. The total hand reach area was 1269 mm long and 731 mm high, while the most comfortable manipulation area was 352 mm long and 649 mm high. The plotted hands reach areas act as a map informing the designer where on the sagittal plane additional accessories operated by the user can be installed.

Indexed as

ErgonomicsWheelchairsBiomechanical PhenomenaEquipment DesignHumansSoftwareUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID37491559
PMCPMC10368659
OpenAlexW4385240198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.