Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37491550›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Custom-made 3D printing-based cranioplasty using a silicone mould and PMMA.

Loránd Csámer, Zoltán Csernátony, László Novák, Viktor Zsolt Kővári, Ágnes Éva Kovács, Hajnalka Soósné Horváth, Sándor Manó

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06782711 (Efficacy and Safety of Customized Skull Implants Made of Polyetheretheretherketone Using Three-dimensional Printing in Patients Undergoing Cranioplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06782711 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Customized Skull Implants Made of Polyetheretheretherketone Using Three-dimensional Printing in Patients Undergoing Cranioplasty

TypeinterventionalSponsorCIMET SCIENTIFIC CORPORATIONRan2025 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsCranial DefectsArmscranioplasty, customized skull implants made of polyetheretheretherketone (PEEK) using 3D printing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cranial Defect Repair With 3D Designed Models.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Loránd CsámerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. csamer.lorand@med.unideb.hu.ORCID 0000-0002-5023-3617
Zoltán CsernátonyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-9631-1492
László NovákDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-0618-8345
Viktor Zsolt KőváriDepartment of Neurosurgery, Health Centre of Hungarian Army, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-5747-1167
Ágnes Éva KovácsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-1198-7229
Hajnalka Soósné HorváthDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-1232-4673
Sándor ManóDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-2108-2685

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All types of cranioplasty techniques restore the morphology of the skull and affect patient aesthetics. Safe and easy techniques are required to enhance patients' recovery and the rehabilitation process. We propose a new method of cranioplasty. The 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of a thin-layer computed tomography (CT) scan of the skull was used to reflect the intact side onto the defect and subtract the overlapping points from one another. In this way, a 3D model of the planned implant can be built in the required shape and size. The precise fit of the implant can be checked by printing the defective part of the skull in case it can be modified. A sterilisable silicone mould based on the finalized model was created afterwards. Polymethyl methacrylate implants were prepared directly in an aseptic environment in the operating room during surgery. Between 2005 and 2020, we performed 54 cranioplasties on 52 patients whose craniotomies were performed previously for indications of traumatic brain injury, stroke or tumour surgeries. No technical problems were noted during the operations. In 2 cases, septic complications that occurred were not connected to the technique itself, and the implants were removed and later replaced. Our proposed technique based on 3D-printed individual silicone moulds is a reliable, safe, easily reproducible and low-cost method to repair different skull defects.

Indexed as

Plastic Surgery ProceduresPolymethyl MethacrylateHumansPrinting, Three-DimensionalProstheses and ImplantsSiliconesSkullPolymethyl MethacrylateSilicones

Identifiers

PMID37491550
PMCPMC10368708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.