ArticleScientific reports2023
Soft-robotic green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas) developed to replace animal experimentation provides new insight into their propulsive strategies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a Numerical Model of a Bio-Inspired Sea Lion Robot.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Design and Machine Learning Modeling of a Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Bionic Pneumatic Soft Actuator.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Biomimetic Hydrofoil Propulsion: Harnessing the Propulsive Capabilities of Sea Turtles and Penguins for Robotics.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Reciprocal actuation core and modular robotic limbs for flying, swimming and running.Communications engineering · 2025Article
- Swimming through sand: using accelerometers to observe the cryptic, pre-emergence life-stage of sea turtle hatchlings.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Development of a Vertical Submerging and Emerging Bat-Ray-Inspired Underwater Vehicle.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas) can swim up to 50 km per day while only consuming seagrass or microalgae. How the animal accomplishes this vast journey on such low energy intake points to the effectiveness of their swimming technique and is a testament to the power of evolution. Understanding the green sea turtle's ability to accomplish these journeys requires insight into their propulsive strategies. Conducting animal testing to uncover their propulsive strategies brings significant challenges: firstly, the ethical issues of conducting experiments on an endangered animal, and secondly, the animal may not even swim with its regular routine during the experiments. In this work, we develop a new soft-robotic sea turtle that reproduces the real animal's form and function to provide biomechanical insights without the need for invasive experimentation. We found that the green sea turtle may only produce propulsion for approximately 30% of the limb beat cycle, with the remaining 70% exploiting a power-preserving low-drag glide. Due to the animal's large mass and relatively low drag coefficient, losses in swim speed are minimal during the gliding stage. These findings may lead to the creation of a new generation of robotic systems for ocean exploration that use an optimised derivative of the sea turtle propulsive strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.