ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2023
SPECT myocardial blood flow quantitation for the detection of angiographic stenoses with cardiac-dedicated CZT SPECT.
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility of Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion with CZT SPECT and SPECT/CT: Current Limitations and Recommendations for Future Improvements.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- A two-stage multimodal learning framework for the automated diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease based on dynamic single-photon emission computed tomography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of myocardial flow reserve quantification with single photon emission computed tomography - a systematic review and meta-analysis.EJNMMI research · 2025Article
- Recent Progress in PET and SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: From Radiopharmaceuticals to Imaging Innovations.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPRReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCZT SPECT with the enhanced imaging characteristic facilitates SPECT myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantitation moving toward a clinical utility to uncover myocardial ischemia. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of stress MBF, myocardial flow reserve (MFR) and myocardial flow capacity (MFC) derived from CZT SPECT in the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD).
methodsOne-hundred and eighty patients underwent two-day rest/adenosine-stress scans for SPECT MBF quantitation. All dynamic SPECT images were reconstructed and corrected with necessary corrections. The one-tissue two-compartment kinetic model was utilized to fit kinetic parameters (K1, k2 and FBV) by numeric optimization and converted to MBF from K1. Rest MBF, stress MBF and MFR in left ventricle and coronary territories were calculated from flow polar maps. MFC was assessed by extents of moderately and severely abnormal flow statuses using an integrated flow diagram. Per-patient and per-vessel analyses were performed to determine cutoff values for the detection of angiographically obstructive and flow-limited CAD.
resultsUsing the threshold of ≥ 50% stenosis, 149 patients (82.78%) were classified to have obstructive lesions in 355 vessels (65.74%). Using the threshold of ≥ 70% stenosis, 113 patients (62.78%) were classified to have flow-limited lesions in 282 vessels (52.22%). On per-patient analysis, the optimal cutoff values of stress MBF and MFR to detect ≥ 50% stenosis were (1.44 ml/min/g, 1.96) and (1.34 ml/min/g and 1.75) to detect ≥ 70% stenosis. The optimal cutoff values for severely and combined moderately severely abnormal MFC extents were (2.3-2.5%, 23.1%) and (7.5%, 29.4%), respectively. The overall sensitivity of MFC (0.84-0.86, 0.86-0.90) to detect ≥ 50% and ≥ 70% lesions surpassed those of stress MBF (0.78. 0.78) and MFR (0.80, 0.75) (all p < 0.05) with similar specificity (MFC = 0.84-0.90, 0.87-0.91; stress MBF = 0.87, 0.91; MFR = 0.84, 0.89) (all p≥ 0.05).
conclusionThe non-invasive SPECT MBF quantitation using CZT SPECT is a reliable method to detect angiographically obstructive and flow-limited CAD. Myocardial flow capacity can outperform with higher diagnostic sensitivity than stress MBF or MFR alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.