Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37491468›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Surgically treated cervical cancer in a high-risk group in the era of the 2018 FIGO staging schema: a nationwide study.

Shogo Shigeta, Muneaki Shimada, Keita Tsuji, Zen Watanabe, Yasuhito Tanase, Koji Matsuo, Toru Nakanishi, Toshiaki Saito, Daisuke Aoki, Mikio Mikami

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Shogo ShigetaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-Machi, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Muneaki ShimadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-Machi, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan. muneaki.shimada.b7@tohoku.ac.jp.
Keita TsujiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-Machi, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Zen WatanabeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-Machi, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Yasuhito TanaseDepartment of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji MatsuoDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Toru NakanishiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Miyagi, Japan.
Toshiaki SaitoGynecology Service, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Daisuke AokiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mikio MikamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tohoku University · JPKeio University · JPNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center · JPTohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University · JPTokai University · JPTokyo National Hospital · JPUniversity of Southern California · USYokohama City University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) revision to the staging criteria for uterine cervical cancer adopted pathological staging for patients who underwent surgery. We investigated the correlation between clinicopathological factors and prognosis in patients with high-risk factors in accordance with the FIGO 2018 staging criteria by analyzing a real-world database of 6,192 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy at 116 institutions belonging to the Japan Gynecologic Oncology Group. A total of 1,392 patients were categorized into the high-risk group. Non-squamous cell carcinoma histology, regional lymph node metastasis, pT2 classification, and ovarian metastasis were identified as independent risk factors for mortality. Based on pathological findings, 313, 1003, and 76 patients were re-classified into FIGO 2018 stages IIB, IIIC1p, and IIIC2p, respectively. Patients with stage IIIC2p disease showed worse prognoses than those with stage IIB or IIIC1p disease. In patients with stage IIIC1p disease, overall survival was significantly better if their tumors were localized in the uterine cervix, except for single lymph node metastasis, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 91.8%. This study clarified the heterogeneity of the high-risk group and provided insights into the feasibility of upfront radical hysterectomy for a limited number of patients harboring high-risk factors.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansHysterectomyLymphatic MetastasisNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37491468
PMCPMC10368631
OpenAlexW4385209190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.