Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37491261›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023

Skeletal effects of eccentric strengthening exercise: a scoping review.

Harshvardhan Singh, Bethany A Moore, Roshita Rathore, William R Reed, William R Thompson, Gordon Fisher, Donald H Lein, Gary R Hunter

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Using Isometric Squat Strength to Predict Concentric and Eccentric Squat Strength in Young and Older Adults.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Harshvardhan SinghDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, US. hsingh@uab.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5945-8102
Bethany A MooreDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, US.
Roshita RathoreDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, US.
William R ReedDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, US.
William R ThompsonDepartment of Physical Therapy, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, US.
Gordon FisherDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, US.
Donald H LeinDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, US.
Gary R HunterDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, US.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital · US

Funding

Why is the prevalence of obesity so high in U.S. Southern States? Regional predictors of BMI and obesity treatment response.P30DK056336 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI James O Hill · 2000 to 2026
$31.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConventional progressive concentric strengthening exercise (CSE) to improve bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) may not be feasible for populations with chronic musculoskeletal and/or metabolic conditions, such as osteoporosis or obesity. Muscle lengthening exercise, also known as an eccentric strengthening exercise (ESE), may have a special utility for those populations due to greater force generation versus CSE. In fact, greater mechanical loading can be induced on bone at lower resistance levels with ESE. However, effects of ESE on BMD and BMC are unclear. Thus, the purpose of this review was to interrogate the effects of ESE on BMD and BMC.

methodsA literature review was conducted between January 1995 and April 2022 focusing on randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of ESE on BMD and/or BMC in humans. Terms covering the domains of exercise, bone, and populations were searched on PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus. The methodological quality of each interventional study was rated using Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. Cohen's d was calculated to determine the magnitude of the effects of ERE on site-specific outcome measures of BMD and/or BMC.

resultsOut of 1,182 articles initially found, a total of seven full length articles met our inclusion criteria. Of the seven studies, most of the interventions were performed in young (n = 5, PEDro = 5-7) versus middle-aged (n = 1, PEDro = 4) or older (n = 1, PEDro = 6) adults. BMD and BMC generally improved due to ESE; however the effects of ESE on BMD and BMC were non-homogenous. Effect size (d) ranged from 0.10-0.87 in young adults while it was 1.16 in older adults. Effect size (d) could not be calculated for the middle-aged adult study due to critical methodological limitations of the intervention.

conclusionsLarge variability exists for the effectiveness of ESE on BMD/BMC across the human life spectrum. The benefits of ESE on BMD holds promise but rigorous studies are lacking. Further research is needed to examine if the dose, mode, age, and sex-specificity dictate effects of ESE on BMD/BMC.

Indexed as

Bone DensityOsteoporosisAgedBone and BonesExerciseHumansMiddle AgedBoneEccentricExerciseLoadOlder

Identifiers

PMID37491261
PMCPMC10367324
OpenAlexW4385240370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.