Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37491204›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2023

Combining host and rumen metagenome profiling for selection in sheep: prediction of methane, feed efficiency, production, and health traits.

Melanie K Hess, Larissa Zetouni, Andrew S Hess, Juliana Budel, Ken G Dodds, Hannah M Henry, Rudiger Brauning, Alan F McCulloch, Sharon M Hickey, Patricia L Johnson and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Combining genomics and semen microbiome increases the accuracy of predicting bull prolificacy.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Melanie K HessUniversity Invermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Ltd., Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand. melanie.k.hess@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7502-0036
Larissa ZetouniUniversity Invermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Ltd., Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand.
Andrew S HessUniversity Invermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Ltd., Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand.
Juliana BudelUniversity Invermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Ltd., Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand.
Ken G DoddsUniversity Invermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Ltd., Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand.
Hannah M HenryUniversity Invermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Ltd., Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand.
Rudiger BrauningUniversity Invermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Ltd., Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand.
Alan F McCullochUniversity Invermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Ltd., Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand.
Sharon M HickeyRuakura Research Centre, AgResearch Ltd., Private Bag 3115, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.
Patricia L JohnsonUniversity Invermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Ltd., Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand.
Sara ElmesDeer Industry New Zealand, PO Box 10702, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand.
Janine WingPāmu, Landcorp Farming Ltd, PO Box 5349, Wellington, 6011, New Zealand.
Brooke BrysonWoodlands Research Farm, AgResearch Ltd., 204 Woodlands-Morton Mains Road, Woodlands, 9871, New Zealand.
Kevin KnowlerUniversity Invermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Ltd., Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand.
Dianne HyndmanUniversity Invermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Ltd., Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand.
Hayley BairdUniversity Invermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Ltd., Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand.
Kathryn M McRaeUniversity Invermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Ltd., Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand.
Arjan JonkerGrasslands Research Centre, AgResearch Ltd., Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North, 4410, New Zealand.
Peter H JanssenGrasslands Research Centre, AgResearch Ltd., Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North, 4410, New Zealand.
John C McEwanUniversity Invermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Ltd., Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand.
Suzanne J RoweUniversity Invermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Ltd., Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand.
AgResearch · NZManaaki Whenua – Landcare Research · NZUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · USUniversity of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

Global Research Alliance on Agricultural Livestock Emmissions Research SOW-AGR-GPLER-SP5Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment C10X1306Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment C10X1807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRumen microbes break down complex dietary carbohydrates into energy sources for the host and are increasingly shown to be a key aspect of animal performance. Host genotypes can be combined with microbial DNA sequencing to predict performance traits or traits related to environmental impact, such as enteric methane emissions. Metagenome profiles were generated from 3139 rumen samples, collected from 1200 dual purpose ewes, using restriction enzyme-reduced representation sequencing (RE-RRS). Phenotypes were available for methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, the ratio of CH4 to CH4 plus CO2 (CH4Ratio), feed efficiency (residual feed intake: RFI), liveweight at the time of methane collection (LW), liveweight at 8 months (LW8), fleece weight at 12 months (FW12) and parasite resistance measured by faecal egg count (FEC1). We estimated the proportion of phenotypic variance explained by host genetics and the rumen microbiome, as well as prediction accuracies for each of these traits.

resultsIncorporating metagenome profiles increased the variance explained and prediction accuracy compared to fitting only genomics for all traits except for CO2 emissions when animals were on a grass diet. Combining the metagenome profile with host genotype from lambs explained more than 70% of the variation in methane emissions and residual feed intake. Predictions were generally more accurate when incorporating metagenome profiles compared to genetics alone, even when considering profiles collected at different ages (lamb vs adult), or on different feeds (grass vs lucerne pellet). A reference-free approach to metagenome profiling performed better than metagenome profiles that were restricted to capturing genera from a reference database. We hypothesise that our reference-free approach is likely to outperform other reference-based approaches such as 16S rRNA gene sequencing for use in prediction of individual animal performance.

conclusionsThis paper shows the potential of using RE-RRS as a low-cost, high-throughput approach for generating metagenome profiles on thousands of animals for improved prediction of economically and environmentally important traits. A reference-free approach using a microbial relationship matrix from log

Indexed as

MetagenomeMethaneAnimal FeedAnimalsCarbon DioxideDietFemalePhenotypeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRumenSheepCarbon DioxideMethaneRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID37491204
PMCPMC10367317
OpenAlexW4385255479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.