Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37490741›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2023

A Qualitative Assessment of a Training and Communication Intervention on Antibiotic Prescription Practices Among Health Workers and Outpatients at Public Health Facilities in Uganda.

David Kaawa-Mafigiri, Deborah Ekusai-Sebatta, Elizeus Rutebemberwa, Asadu Sserwanga, Freddy Eric Kitutu, James Kapisi, Heidi Hopkins, Olawale Salami, Juvenal Nkeramahame, Piero Olliaro and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

David Kaawa-MafigiriDepartment of Social Work and Social Administration, School of Social Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-2699-4248
Deborah Ekusai-SebattaInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Elizeus RutebemberwaDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Asadu SserwangaInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Freddy Eric KitutuDepartment of Pharmacy, Makerere University School of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
James KapisiInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Heidi HopkinsLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Olawale SalamiFIND, Geneva, Switzerland.
Juvenal NkeramahameFIND, Geneva, Switzerland.
Piero OlliaroFIND, Geneva, Switzerland.
Philip HorganFIND, Geneva, Switzerland.
FIND · CHInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration · UGMakerere University · UGLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotic prescribing practices are 1 of the contributing causes of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The study explored the key drivers and barriers to adherence to prescribing instructions among healthcare workers and outpatient attendees with the aim of developing a training and communication intervention to improve adherence to prescription.

methodsPrior to randomized trials at 3 health centers in Uganda (Aduku, Kihihi, and Nagongera), a pre-intervention qualitative assessment was conducted to explore behavioral drivers for adherence to prescriptions and the communication of adherence messages. Based on the findings, a training and communication package was developed for healthcare workers and patients at Day 0 of the trial. During the trial's Day 7 patient follow-up, in-depth interviews were conducted to further investigate adherence behaviors.

resultsFive main themes were identified that acted as drivers or barriers to prescription adherence. Key drivers included: drug availability at health facility, health worker knowledge, and communication to patients. Barriers included: care-seeker use of treatment resorts and an inability by care-seeker to buy drugs.

conclusionsThe T&C appeared to influence both health workers' and patients' behavior and improve adherence to prescription.The adapted T&C should be considered a toolkit to improve antibiotic use across health facilities accompanied with appropriate guidelines to mitigate AMR.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsOutpatientsHealth FacilitiesHealth PersonnelHumansPrescriptionsUgandaAnti-Bacterial Agentsacute febrile illnessantimicrobial resistanceprescription adherence behaviorprescription adherence communication

Identifiers

PMID37490741
PMCPMC10368412
OpenAlexW4385264670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.