Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37490557›Full record

Trial reportMedical education online2023

Impact of fully guided implant planning software training on the knowledge acquisition and satisfaction of dental undergraduate students.

Shishir Ram Shetty, Colin Alexander Murray, Sausan Al Kawas, Sara Jaser, Natheer Al-Rawi, Wael Talaat, Sangeetha Narasimhan, Sunaina Shetty, Pooja Adtani, Shruthi Hegde

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical education online, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Improving Evaluation of Dentistry Students in an Oral Surgery and Implantology Subject: The PIETA Rubric.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shishir Ram ShettyCollege of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-8097-6024
Colin Alexander MurrayCollege of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Sausan Al KawasCollege of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Sara JaserCollege of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Natheer Al-RawiCollege of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Wael TalaatCollege of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Sangeetha NarasimhanCollege of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Sunaina ShettyCollege of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Pooja AdtaniCollege of Dentistry, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Shruthi HegdeNitte (Deemed to Be University), Mangalore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA majority of dental school students do not undergo hands-on clinical training in implantology in the undergraduate curriculum. Training is usually restricted to pre-implant evaluation and post-implant prostheses. Virtual implant planning software (VIPS) provides an alternative opportunity for undergraduate students to experience implant planning much before gaining hands-on experience. However, not many studies have the contribution of VIPS to the knowledge acquisition of students. We conducted a preliminary study to evaluate the knowledge acquisition of the students when exposed to a hands-on session of VIPS. We also evaluated students' satisfaction levels, when exposed to hands-on training in fully guided implant planning software.

methodsA two-part theory lecture on fully guided implant planning was delivered to 90, 5th (final)-year dental undergraduate students by the oral radiology faculty. The students were then randomly divided into three groups. Group A was exposed to didactic lectures only. Group B was shown a video for fully guided implant planning in addition to the didactic lecture. Group C was shown a video for fully guided implant planning in addition to a didactic lecture and then performed a hands-on session of virtual implant planning under faculty guidance. Students from all groups were given an MCQ-based test. After the completion of the test students from group A and B also received VIPS hands-on training. Students from all three groups answered and a feedback questionnaire regarding their satisfaction levels with VIPS.

resultsThe overall test score of students in Group C was higher than their colleagues in both Groups A and B and the differences were statistically significant (

conclusionsThe utilization of VIPS in the training of dental undergraduate students improves their performance confirming better knowledge acquisition and content mastery.

Indexed as

CurriculumStudents, DentalHumansPersonal SatisfactionProstheses and ImplantsSoftwaredental studentseducationimplant planning softwareknowledge acquisitionsatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID37490557
PMCPMC10392243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.