Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37490486›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

An emerging field: An evaluation of biomedical graduate student and postdoctoral education and training research across seven decades.

Audra Van Wart, Dušanka Djorić, Natalie M D'Silva, Rebekah Layton, LaKeya Hardy, Elizabeth Suelzer, Julie E Tetzlaff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Audra Van WartDivision of Biology and Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6719-7085
Dušanka DjorićDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Natalie M D'SilvaDivision of Biology and Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4068-0218
Rebekah LaytonOffice of Graduate Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7113-1348
LaKeya HardyOffice of Graduate Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Elizabeth SuelzerMCW Libraries, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1809-8080
Julie E TetzlaffDivision of Pediatric Pathology, Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7796-7979

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115677 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI CHOUDHARY, GAURAV · 2016 to 2025
$45.0M
Advancing the Research Careers of Women and PEERs in Brain ScienceR25NS124530 · NINDS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI CARLOS D AIZENMAN, Diane Lipscombe · 2022 to 2026
$1.3M
SCISIPBIO: Training Leaders - Professional Development, Mental Health, Mentoring R01GM140282 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LAYTON, REBEKAH L · 2020 to 2023
$879k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM140282NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115677NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS124530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomedical graduate student and postdoctoral education and training research has expanded greatly over the last seven decades, leading to increased publications and the emergence of a field. The goal of this study was to analyze this growth by performing a cross-sectional bibliometric analysis using a systematic approach to better understand the publishing trends (including historical vs. emerging themes and research priorities); depth, structure, and evidence-basis of content; and venues for publication. The analysis documented a dramatic increase in biomedical trainee-related publications over time and showed that this area of research is maturing into its own independent field. Results demonstrated that the most frequently published article types in this field are shorter editorial and opinion pieces, and that evidence-based articles are less numerous. However, if current trends continue, projections indicate that by the year 2035, evidence-based articles will be the dominating article type published in this field. Most frequently published topics included career outcomes and workforce characterization and professional development. In recent years, the most cited articles were publications focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion, career outcomes and workforce characterization, and wellness. This study also shows that although a small subset of journals publishes most of this literature, publications are distributed diffusely across a wide range of journals and that surprisingly 68% of these journals have published only a single article on the topic. Further, we noted that the assignment of author- and index-supplied keywords was variable and inconsistent and speculate that this could create challenges to conducting comprehensive literature searches. Recommendations to address this include establishing standard keyword assignment criteria and proposing new index-supplied keywords to improve accessibility of research findings. These changes will be important for bringing visibility of this literature to our community, institutional leaders, national trainee organizations, and funding agencies.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchBibliometricsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansStudentsWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID37490486
PMCPMC10368290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.