Data Sharing for Pediatric Clinical Trials Funded by the US National Institutes of Health.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Open science interventions to improve reproducibility and replicability of research: a scoping review.Royal Society open science · 2025
   Article
2. The childhood cancer data initiative: enabling data sharing to drive research advances and transform pediatric cancer diagnosis and treatment.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2025
   Review
3. Clinical trial data sharing: a cross-sectional study of outcomes associated with two U.S. National Institutes of Health models.Scientific data · 2023
   Article
4. Integrating Global Health Concepts into Pediatric Emergency Medicine Training and Practice: A Narrative Review.Sage open pediatrics
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as