Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37490234›Full record

ArticleNeurology and therapy2023

Blood-Brain Barrier Breakdown is a Sensitive Biomarker of Cognitive and Language Impairment in Patients with White Matter Hyperintensities.

Xing Wang, Yulu Shi, Yiyi Chen, Ying Gao, Tingting Wang, Zhengyang Li, Yilong Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Targeting angiogenesis and white matter repair for enhanced functional recovery after acute ischemic stroke: A focus on the roles of glial cells.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xing Wang *Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2435-6533
Yulu Shi *Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Yiyi ChenDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Ying GaoDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Tingting WangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Zhengyang LiDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Yilong WangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China. yilong528@aliyun.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2725-2788
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

Beijing Laboratory of Oral Health PXM2021_014226_000041Beijing Outstanding Young Scientist Program (No. BJJWZYJH01201910025030Beijing Talent Project - Class A: Innovation and Development No. 2018A12Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research 2022-2-2045National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFF1501500, 2022YFF1501501, 377 18 2022YFF1501502, 2022YFF1501503, 2022YFF1501504, 2022YFF1501505National Key R&D Program of China No. 2017YFC1307900, 2017YFC1307905The National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 81825007The National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 82001241Youth Beijing Scholar Program No. 010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSimilar white matter hyperintensities (WMH) burden may have varied cognitive outcomes in patients with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD). This study aimed to evaluate whether blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability is associated with cognitive impairment (CI) heterogeneity in patients with WMH.

methodsWe recruited 51 participants with WMH. We evaluated WMH burden using the Fazekas scale and WMH volume on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and assessed BBB permeability using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI. We used permeability-surface area product (PS) from the Patlak model to represent BBB permeability. All patients underwent Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Boston Naming Test (BNT) and animal verbal fluency test (VFT) for cognitive assessment. We divided patients into CI and non-CI groups based on their MMSE scores (< 27 or ≥ 27) and used multiple linear regression models to investigate the associations between MRI parameters and cognitive function.

resultsPatients in the two groups did not differ in Fazekas scores and WMH volume. However, patients in the CI group showed significantly higher PS in the WMH regions than those in non-CI group (1.89 × 10

conclusionBBB impairment might be a more sensitive indicator for cognitive and language dysfunction than WMH volume in patients with WMH and possibly explains the heterogeneity of cognitive performance in patients with similar WMH burden.

Indexed as

Blood–brain barrierCerebral small vessel diseaseCognitive impairmentDynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imagingWhite matter hyperintensities

Identifiers

PMID37490234
PMCPMC10444912
OpenAlexW4385208910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.