ReviewEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2023
Different gastric tubes in esophageal reconstruction during esophagectomy.
Review in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conduit size and the risk of delayed gastric conduit emptying after esophagectomy.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Impact of thoracic inlet anatomy and reconstruction route selection based on computed tomography three-dimensional reconstruction on cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Nonsupercharged cervical Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy for esophageal reconstruction.JTCVS techniques · 2026Article
- Preoperative serum prealbumin as a prognostic marker for survival after gallbladder cancer resection: a multicenter study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Remission of type 2 diabetes one year after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction: A prospective cohort study.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Automated machine learning model for predicting anastomotic strictures after esophageal cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Case Report: Surgery for proximal gastric cancer with splenic artery aneurysm: approach and complication mangement.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophagectomy is currently the mainstay of treatment for resectable esophageal carcinoma. Gastric grafts are the first substitutes in esophageal reconstruction. According to the different tailoring methods applied to the stomach, gastric grafts can be classified as whole stomach, subtotal stomach and gastric tube. Gastric-tube placement has been proven to be the preferred method, with advantages in terms of postoperative complications and long-term survival. In recent years, several novel methods involving special-shaped gastric tubes have been proposed, which have further decreased the incidence of perioperative complications. This article will review the progress and clinical application status of different types of gastric grafts from the perspectives of preparation methods, studies of anatomy and perioperative outcomes, existing problems and future outlook.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.