ReviewCurrent oncology reports2023
Enhanced Recovery in Gynecologic Oncology Surgery-State of the Science.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06655506 (Enhanced Recovery Protocols in Gynecological Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Enhanced Recovery Protocols in Gynecological Cancer Patients: a Feasibility Study
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of enhanced recovery after surgery-based perioperative nursing on postoperative pain and recovery in patients with cervical cancer: A retrospective cohort study.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- Patient perspectives on perioperative telemedicine in female malignancies: the role of age, digital experience, and privacy concerns.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage: A Comprehensive Single-Center Analysis of Colorectal Anastomoses for Ovarian and Gastrointestinal Cancers.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Tailored Strategies to Prevent Anastomotic Leakage After Colorectal Resections: The Importance of Understanding Risks in Different Patient Subtypes.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Impact of Epidural Anesthesia on the Outcome of Elderly Patients with Endometrial Cancer: Results of a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Oncology research and treatment · 2025Article
- Readiness for Discharge, Quality of Discharge Teaching, Anxiety and Depression in Surgical Patients With Cervical Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeof reviewThe purpose of this review is to describe the state of the science of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in gynecologic oncology. RECENT
findingsOver the last 5 years, there is mounting evidence supporting ERAS in gynecologic oncology surgery. Despite this, surveys have found suboptimal uptake of ERAS, and stakeholders have highlighted the difficulty of ERAS implementation as a major barrier. To address this, the core components required for a successful ERAS implementation program (protocol, ERAS team, audit system) are reviewed. ERAS developments specific to gynecologic oncology are also discussed, including same-day discharge initiatives for minimally invasive surgery, implications of telemedicine, and methods to increase uptake of ERAS in low- and middle-income countries. ERAS is a surgical quality improvement program with strong evidence supporting its effectiveness in gynecologic oncology. Efforts are required to address ERAS implementation barriers to increase uptake globally, especially in low-income settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37490193What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.