Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37490171›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2023

Prediction of nipple involvement in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Should we rely on breast MRI to preserve the nipple?

M Umit Ugurlu, Onur Bugdayci, Ahmet Akmercan, Handan Kaya, Tugba Akin Telli, Haldun Akoglu, Bahadir M Gulluoglu

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M Umit UgurluDepartment of General Surgery, Breast and Endocrine Surgery Unit, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey. umit.ugurlu@marmara.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4757-5560
Onur BugdayciDepartment of Radiology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ahmet AkmercanDepartment of General Surgery, Breast and Endocrine Surgery Unit, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Handan KayaDepartment of Pathology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Tugba Akin TelliDepartment of Medical Oncology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Haldun AkogluDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bahadir M GulluogluDepartment of General Surgery, Breast and Endocrine Surgery Unit, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Marmara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndications for nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) is extending to post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) setting. Eligibility for NSM with an optimum tumor-nipple distance (TND) after NAC is unclear. We examined predictive factors for nipple tumor involvement in patients undergoing total mastectomy following NAC.

methodsClinical and pathological data from prospectively collected medical records of women with invasive breast carcinoma, who were undergone NAC and total mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy and/or axillary lymph node dissection were analyzed. PreNAC and postNAC magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) views were examined and a cut-off TND value for predicting the negative nipple tumor status was determined.

resultsAmong 180 women, the final mastectomy specimen analysis revealed that 12 (7%) had nipple involvement as invasive carcinoma. Patients with nipple involvement had more postNAC multifocal/multicentric tumors (p: 0.03), larger tumors on preNAC and postNAC images (p: 0.002 and p < 0.001), shorter median TNDs on preNAC and postNAC images (7 mm-IQR 1.5-14, p: 0.005 and 8.5 mm-IQR 3-15.5, p < 0.001, respectively), more nipple retraction on preNAC and postNAC images (p: 0.007 and p: 0.006) and more nipple areola complex skin thickening (> 2mm) on preNAC and postNAC images (p < 0.001 and p: 0.01). The best likelihood ratios (LR) belonged to the postNAC positivity of the < 20 mm TND, with a + LR of 3.40, and - LR of 0.11 for nipple involvement. PreNAC positivity of the < 20 mm TND also had a similar - LR of 0.14.

conclusionA TND-cut-off  ≥ 2 cm on preNAC and postNAC MRI was shown to be highly predictive of negative nipple tumor involvement.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMastectomyNeoadjuvant TherapyNipplesRetrospective StudiesBreast cancerBreast magnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant chemotherapyNipple involvement

Identifiers

PMID37490171
OpenAlexW4385230741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.