Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37490128›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

Long leg radiographs underestimate the degree of constitutional varus limb alignment and joint line obliquity in comparison with computed tomography: a radiographic study.

Payam Tarassoli, Luke E Corban, Jil A Wood, Andrew Sergis, Darren B Chen, Samuel J MacDessi

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Payam TarassoliSydney Knee Specialists, Suite 201, Level 2, 131 Princes Hwy, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia.
Luke E CorbanSydney Knee Specialists, Suite 201, Level 2, 131 Princes Hwy, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia.
Jil A WoodSydney Knee Specialists, Suite 201, Level 2, 131 Princes Hwy, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia.
Andrew SergisStryker Australia, 8 Herbert St, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia.
Darren B ChenSydney Knee Specialists, Suite 201, Level 2, 131 Princes Hwy, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia.
Samuel J MacDessiSydney Knee Specialists, Suite 201, Level 2, 131 Princes Hwy, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia. samuelmacdessi@sydneyknee.com.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1578-7614

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to understand if differences exist between computed tomography (CT) and long leg radiographs (LLR) when defining coronal plane alignment of the lower limb in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It aimed to identify any such differences between the two imaging modalities by quantifying constitutional limb alignment (arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), joint line obliquity (JLO) and Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) type within the same population.

methodsA retrospective radiographic study compared pre-operative LLR and CT measurements in patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA. The aHKA, JLO and CPAK types were calculated after measuring the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA). The primary outcomes were the mean differences in aHKA (MPTA-LDFA), JLO (MPTA + LDFA) and proportions of CPAK types between LLR and CT groups. The secondary outcomes were the differences in CT-derived MPTA values based on four different tibial sagittal landmarks.

resultsAfter exclusions, 465 imaging sets were analysed in 394 patients. There was a statistically significant mean difference between LLR and CT, respectively, for both MPTA (87.5° vs. 86.2°; p < 0.01) and LDFA (88.7° vs. 87.3°; p < 0.01). There were also statistically significant differences for aHKA (- 0.2° vs. - 1.1°) and JLO (175.1° vs. 173.4°) for LLR and CT, respectively (both p < 0.01). CT increased the proportion of patients with CPAK Type I (constitutional varus aHKA, apex distal JLO) and CPAK Type II (neutral aHKA, apex distal JLO), and decreased numbers of CPAK Types III-VI. There were significant mean differences in the MPTA using varying sagittal landmarks.

conclusionAlignment determined by LLRs underestimates the magnitude of both constitutional varus alignment and joint line obliquity compared to CT, differences that notably increase the proportions of patients included in CPAK Types I and II. These distinctions are primarily due to underestimation of proximal tibial varus when measured on LLRs compared to CT, which more specifically defines articular weight-bearing points. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBone MalalignmentKnee JointOsteoarthritis, KneeTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographyRetrospective StudiesTibiaArithmetic HKAConstitutional alignmentCPAKJoint line obliquityKinematic alignmentTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.