Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37489919›Full record

ArticleJournal of cutaneous medicine and surgery

Surveillance After a Previous Cutaneous Melanoma Diagnosis: A Scoping Review of Melanoma Follow-Up Guidelines.

Leah Johnston, Samantha Starkey, Ilya Mukovozov, Lynne Robertson, Teresa Petrella, Raed Alhusayen

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Delayed diagnosis of metastatic melanoma reoccurrence: Case report.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Precision Oncology in Melanoma: Changing Practices.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Melanoma crash course.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Leah JohnstonCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0994-1603
Samantha StarkeyFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ilya MukovozovDepartment of Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1058-9413
Lynne RobertsonDivision of Dermatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Teresa PetrellaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Raed AlhusayenSunnybrook Research Institute, Division of Dermatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Calgary · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCutaneous melanoma accounts for more than 70% of all skin cancer deaths. Follow-up surveillance is an integral part of melanoma patient care, to facilitate early detection of recurrences and subsequent primary melanomas. The purpose of this scoping review is to provide an overview of recently published melanoma surveillance guidelines from regional and national melanoma working groups.

methodsA systematic search for relevant studies in MEDLINE and Embase was conducted in September 2022 and was limited to publications from 2010 or later.

resultsA total of 1047 articles were retrieved, and after abstract and full text review, 26 articles from 19 different organizations met inclusion criteria. Life-long annual skin surveillance with a physician was recommended by 53% (9/17) of guidelines. Routine laboratory investigations were recommended by 7/19 guidelines. Regional lymph node ultrasound was recommended by 9/16 guidelines, most often in stage IB or higher, and was optional in 7/16 for patients who met specific criteria. Surveillance with PET-CT or CT and MRI was recommended by 15 and 11 guidelines, respectively, most commonly in stage IIC or higher, with a variable frequency and total duration. Five out of 9 guidelines indicated a preference for skin surveillance to be completed with a dermatologist.

conclusionGuidelines were highly variable for many aspects of melanoma surveillance, which may be partly attributed to regional differences in healthcare workforce distribution and availability of imaging technologies. Further high-level studies are recommended to provide more evidence on the most effective clinical and imaging follow-up surveillance protocols.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsCutaneous Malignant MelanomaFollow-Up StudiesHumansPositron Emission Tomography Computed Tomographyclinical practice guidelinesfollow-upmelanomareviewskin cancersurveillance

Identifiers

PMID37489919
PMCPMC10617001
OpenAlexW4385230010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.