Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37489913›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2023

Differential benefits of unmasking extended high-frequency content of target or background speech.

Brian B Monson, Rohit M Ananthanarayana, Allison Trine, Vahid Delaram, G Christopher Stecker, Emily Buss

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brian B MonsonDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61820, USA.
Rohit M AnanthanarayanaDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61820, USA.
Allison TrineDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61820, USA.
Vahid DelaramDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61820, USA.
G Christopher SteckerSpatial Hearing Laboratory, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1442-9839
Emily BussDepartment of Otolaryngology/HNS, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8244-3013
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USBoys Town National Research Hospital · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

The ecological significance of extended high-frequency hearing in humansR01DC019745 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI MONSON, BRIAN BRUCE · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current evidence supports the contribution of extended high frequencies (EHFs; >8 kHz) to speech recognition, especially for speech-in-speech scenarios. However, it is unclear whether the benefit of EHFs is due to phonetic information in the EHF band, EHF cues to access phonetic information at lower frequencies, talker segregation cues, or some other mechanism. This study investigated the mechanisms of benefit derived from a mismatch in EHF content between target and masker talkers for speech-in-speech recognition. EHF mismatches were generated using full band (FB) speech and speech low-pass filtered at 8 kHz. Four filtering combinations with independently filtered target and masker speech were used to create two EHF-matched and two EHF-mismatched conditions for one- and two-talker maskers. Performance was best with the FB target and the low-pass masker in both one- and two-talker masker conditions, but the effect was larger for the two-talker masker. No benefit of an EHF mismatch was observed for the low-pass filtered target. A word-by-word analysis indicated higher recognition odds with increasing EHF energy level in the target word. These findings suggest that the audibility of target EHFs provides target phonetic information or target segregation and selective attention cues, but that the audibility of masker EHFs does not confer any segregation benefit.

Indexed as

PhoneticsSpeechCuesRecognition, Psychology

Identifiers

PMID37489913
PMCPMC10371353
OpenAlexW4385230131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.