Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37489491›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2023

Communicating a Positive Result at Newborn Screening and Parental Distress.

Elisa Lastrucci, Marta Daniotti, Elena Procopio, Giusi Scaturro, Flavia Tubili, Rosanna Martin, Giancarlo la Marca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elisa LastrucciDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, 50019 Florence, Italy.
Marta DaniottiMetabolic Diseases Unit, Neuroscience Department, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, 50139 Florence, Italy.
Elena ProcopioMetabolic Diseases Unit, Neuroscience Department, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, 50139 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8534-9951
Giusi ScaturroMetabolic Diseases Unit, Neuroscience Department, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, 50139 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9574-0188
Flavia TubiliMetabolic Diseases Unit, Neuroscience Department, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, 50139 Florence, Italy.
Rosanna MartinPsychology Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, 50139 Florence, Italy.
Giancarlo la MarcaDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, 50019 Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assumption of this study is strictly connected to the need to focus and to know more about the impact on the psychological state of the parents whose newborn babies get a positive result at Expanded Newborn Screening (ENS). As clinical experience shows us, this aspect seems to have a potentially lasting resonance on the way the disease will be managed and handled in the family, leading to potential negative effects and repercussions on the child's wellbeing and on the quality of life within the family. On the basis of this and on the evidence emerging from a review of the literature, this study aims to investigate and objectify possible distress indicators elicited at the moment of the communication of a positive result at ENS. Questionnaires containing the Beck Depression Inventory-II, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Y, and the Short Form 36 Health Survey tests were administered to the parents of 87 newborns who received positive results at ENS. The parents of 32 babies expressed the presence of discomfort potentially related to the communication of a positive result at ENS.

Indexed as

familiar stressnewborn screeningpositive result

Identifiers

PMID37489491
PMCPMC10366888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.