Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37489488›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of neonatal screening2023

Is Our Newborn Screening Working Well? A Literature Review of Quality Requirements for Newborn Blood Spot Screening (NBS) Infrastructure and Procedures.

Birgit Odenwald, Inken Brockow, Marianne Hanauer, Anja Lüders, Uta Nennstiel

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of neonatal screening, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Birgit OdenwaldNewborn Screening Centre/State Institute of Health, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0137-4819
Inken BrockowNewborn Screening Centre/State Institute of Health, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany.
Marianne HanauerNewborn Screening Centre/State Institute of Health, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany.
Anja LüdersNewborn Screening Centre/State Institute of Health, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany.
Uta NennstielNewborn Screening Centre/State Institute of Health, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany.

Funding

German National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds (Spitzenverband der Gesetzlichen Krankenkassen Deutschlands, GKV-Spitzenverband) part of project SV 20-16 "Organisatorische Weiterentwickung des Erweiterten Neugeborenen-Screenings in Deutschland"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newborn screening using dried blood spots (NBS) is widely acknowledged as a highly successful procedure in secondary prevention. For a number of congenital disorders, severe disability or death are impressively prevented by early detection and early treatment through NBS. However, as with any other screening, NBS can also cause harm, and the principle that "the overall benefits of screening should outweigh the harms" must be considered when introducing and implementing NBS programmes. This publication compiles the results of a systematic literature research on requirements for NBS infrastructure and procedures which was conducted as part of a research project on the quality and shortcomings of the NBS pathway in Germany. The compilation contains the requirements and recommendations for realising the principle of "maximise benefits and minimise harms" in relevant NBS pathway components such as parental education and information, coverage, timeliness, laboratory quality assurance, follow-up of abnormal results, confirmatory diagnostics, documentation, and evaluation. The results reflect the complexity of NBS infrastructure, and thus, they illustrate the importance of considering and implementing NBS as a well-coordinated public health programme with continuous quality management. Special attention should be paid to the perspectives of parents and families. Some NBS issues can substantially benefit from digital instruments or international cooperation. The literature review presented here has contributed to a concept of proposals for the advancement of NBS in Germany, and despite different settings, it may as well be of interest for other countries to achieve the best possible course and outcome of NBS for each child.

Indexed as

dried blood spotsevaluationneonatal screeningnewborn screeningprocess qualityquality managementscreening programme

Identifiers

PMID37489488
PMCPMC10366861
OpenAlexW4381804916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.