Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37489471›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2023

Impact of Tomosynthesis Acquisition on 3D Segmentations of Breast Outline and Adipose/Dense Tissue with AI: A Simulation-Based Study.

Bruno Barufaldi, Jordy Gomes, Thais G do Rego, Yuri Malheiros, Telmo M Silva Filho, Lucas R Borges, Raymond J Acciavatti, Suleman Surti, Andrew D A Maidment

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bruno BarufaldiDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3954-3611
Jordy GomesCenter of Informatics, Federal University of Paraiba, Joao Pessoa 58051-900, PB, Brazil.
Thais G do RegoCenter of Informatics, Federal University of Paraiba, Joao Pessoa 58051-900, PB, Brazil.
Yuri MalheirosCenter of Informatics, Federal University of Paraiba, Joao Pessoa 58051-900, PB, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7779-0288
Telmo M Silva FilhoDepartment of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1QU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0826-6885
Lucas R BorgesReal Time Tomography, LCC, Villanova, PA 19085-1801, USA.
Raymond J AcciavattiDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4822-3353
Suleman SurtiDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Andrew D A MaidmentDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Robert H. Vonderheide · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
High Performance, Quantitative Breast PET Scanner Integrated With TomosynthesisR01CA196528 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ANDREW DOUGLAS ARNOLD MAIDMENT, Suleman Surti · 2016 to 2026
$5.9M
Next-Generation Tomosynthesis Pilot StudyR37CA273959 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Raymond Joseph Acciavatti · 2022 to 2026
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA196528NCI NIH HHS R37 CA273959NIH HHS P30CA016520NIH HHS R01CA196528NIH HHS R37CA273959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) reconstructions introduce out-of-plane artifacts and false-tissue boundaries impacting the dense/adipose and breast outline (convex hull) segmentations. A virtual clinical trial method was proposed to segment both the breast tissues and the breast outline in DBT reconstructions. The DBT images of a representative population were simulated using three acquisition geometries: a left-right scan (conventional, I), a two-directional scan in the shape of a "T" (II), and an extra-wide range (XWR, III) left-right scan at a six-times higher dose than I. The nnU-Net was modified including two losses for segmentation: (1) tissues and (2) breast outline. The impact of loss (1) and the combination of loss (1) and (2) was evaluated using models trained with data simulating geometry I. The impact of the geometry was evaluated using the combined loss (1&2). The loss (1&2) improved the convex hull estimates, resolving 22.2% of the false classification of air voxels. Geometry II was superior to I and III, resolving 99.1% and 96.8% of the false classification of air voxels. Geometry III (Dice = (0.98, 0.94)) was superior to I (0.92, 0.78) and II (0.93, 0.74) for the tissue segmentation (adipose, dense, respectively). Thus, the loss (1&2) provided better segmentation, and geometries T and XWR improved the dense/adipose and breast outline segmentations relative to the conventional scan.

Indexed as

ArtifactsBreastAdipose TissueFemaleHumansartificial intelligencebreast cancerdigital breast tomosynthesismulti-modality imagingscreeningvirtual clinical trials

Identifiers

PMID37489471
PMCPMC10366831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.