ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2023
A Deep Learning Approach for Rapid and Generalizable Denoising of Photon-Counting Micro-CT Images.
Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding Photon-Counting CT: Physics, Detector Technology, and Image Reconstructions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Denoising pediatric cardiac photon-counting CT data with sparse coding and data-adaptive, self-supervised deep learning.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Transforming Medical Imaging: The Role of Artificial Intelligence Integration in PACS for Enhanced Diagnostic Accuracy and Workflow EfficiencyCurrent medical imaging · 2025Review
- Turn-table micro-CT scanner for dynamic perfusion imaging in mice: design, implementation, and evaluation.Physics in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- Photon-Counting Computed Tomography for Microstructural Imaging of Bone and Joints.Current osteoporosis reports · 2024Review
- A Novel and Reliable Pixel Response Correction Method (DAC-Shifting) for Spectral Photon-Counting CT Imaging.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
- High-Resolution Iodine-Enhanced Micro-Computed Tomography of Intact Human Hearts for Detailed Coronary Microvasculature Analyses.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging and Image Processing-A Review.Cancers · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Photon-counting CT (PCCT) is powerful for spectral imaging and material decomposition but produces noisy weighted filtered backprojection (wFBP) reconstructions. Although iterative reconstruction effectively denoises these images, it requires extensive computation time. To overcome this limitation, we propose a deep learning (DL) model, UnetU, which quickly estimates iterative reconstruction from wFBP. Utilizing a 2D U-net convolutional neural network (CNN) with a custom loss function and transformation of wFBP, UnetU promotes accurate material decomposition across various photon-counting detector (PCD) energy threshold settings. UnetU outperformed multi-energy non-local means (ME NLM) and a conventional denoising CNN called UnetwFBP in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) in test set reconstructions and their respective matrix inversion material decompositions. Qualitative results in reconstruction and material decomposition domains revealed that UnetU is the best approximation of iterative reconstruction. In reconstructions with varying undersampling factors from a high dose ex vivo scan, UnetU consistently gave higher structural similarity (SSIM) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) to the fully sampled iterative reconstruction than ME NLM and UnetwFBP. This research demonstrates UnetU's potential as a fast (i.e., 15 times faster than iterative reconstruction) and generalizable approach for PCCT denoising, holding promise for advancing preclinical PCCT research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.