Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37489360›Full record

ArticleNeurology international2023

Illustrated Neuropathologic Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease.

Nicholas Doher, Vahid Davoudi, Shino Magaki, Ryan A Townley, Mohammad Haeri, Harry V Vinters

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Digital pathology in tau research: A comparison of QuPath and HALO.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Cell-specific protein expression in Alzheimer's disease prefrontal cortex.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas DoherDepartment of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Vahid DavoudiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
Shino MagakiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Ryan A TownleyDepartment of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3566-3969
Mohammad HaeriDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6055-9779
Harry V VintersDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
University of Kansas Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As of 2022, the prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) among individuals aged 65 and older is estimated to be 6.2 million in the United States. This figure is predicted to grow to 13.8 million by 2060. An accurate assessment of neuropathologic changes represents a critical step in understanding the underlying mechanisms in AD. The current method for assessing postmortem Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change follows version 11 of the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) coding guidebook. Ambiguity regarding steps in the ABC scoring method can lead to increased time or inaccuracy in staging AD. We present a concise overview of how this postmortem diagnosis is made and relate it to the evolving understanding of antemortem AD biomarkers.

Indexed as

AD neuropathologic diagnosisAlzheimer’s diseasedementianeurodegenerationtauopathy

Identifiers

PMID37489360
PMCPMC10366902
OpenAlexW4384201975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.