ArticleCancer science2023
Machine learning approaches for predicting 5-year breast cancer survival: A multicenter study.
Article in Cancer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in breast cancer survival prediction: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Review
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Breast Cancer in Women: Insights From Feature Selection of Clinical and Lifestyle Data.International journal of breast cancer · 2026Article
- Predictive nomogram for risk of pulmonary infection in lung cancer patients undergoing radiochemotherapy: development and performance evaluation.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- Application of machine learning in breast cancer survival prediction using a multimethod approach.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Mortality Prediction Modeling for Patients with Breast Cancer Based on Explainable Machine Learning.Cancers · 2024Article
- Prostate cancer treatment recommendation study based on machine learning and SHAP interpreter.Cancer science · 2024Article
- Taipei Medical University Clinical Research Database: a collaborative hospital EHR database aligned with international common data standards.BMJ health & care informatics · 2024Article
- Innovations in Artificial Intelligence-Driven Breast Cancer Survival Prediction: A Narrative Review.Cancer informatics · 2024Article
- Machine learning approaches for predicting 5-year breast cancer survival: A multicenter study.Cancer science · 2023Article
- Unveiling the future of COVID-19 patient care: groundbreaking prediction models for severe outcomes or mortality in hospitalized cases.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The study used clinical data to develop a prediction model for breast cancer survival. Breast cancer prognostic factors were explored using machine learning techniques. We conducted a retrospective study using data from the Taipei Medical University Clinical Research Database, which contains electronic medical records from three affiliated hospitals in Taiwan. The study included female patients aged over 20 years who were diagnosed with primary breast cancer and had medical records in hospitals between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2020. The data were divided into training and external testing datasets. Nine different machine learning algorithms were applied to develop the models. The performances of the algorithms were measured using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1-score. A total of 3914 patients were included in the study. The highest AUC of 0.95 was observed with the artificial neural network model (accuracy, 0.90; sensitivity, 0.71; specificity, 0.73; PPV, 0.28; NPV, 0.94; and F1-score, 0.37). Other models showed relatively high AUC, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83. According to the optimal model results, cancer stage, tumor size, diagnosis age, surgery, and body mass index were the most critical factors for predicting breast cancer survival. The study successfully established accurate 5-year survival predictive models for breast cancer. Furthermore, the study found key factors that could affect breast cancer survival in Taiwanese women. Its results might be used as a reference for the clinical practice of breast cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.