Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37489252›Full record

ArticleCancer science2023

Machine learning approaches for predicting 5-year breast cancer survival: A multicenter study.

Quynh Thi Nhu Nguyen, Phung-Anh Nguyen, Chun-Jung Wang, Phan Thanh Phuc, Ruo-Kai Lin, Chin-Sheng Hung, Nei-Hui Kuo, Yu-Wen Cheng, Shwu-Jiuan Lin, Zong-You Hsieh and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Quynh Thi Nhu NguyenSchool of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Phung-Anh NguyenClinical Data Center, Office of Data Science, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7436-9041
Chun-Jung WangSchool of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Phan Thanh PhucResearch Center of Health Care Industry Data Science, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9132-1456
Ruo-Kai LinSchool of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chin-Sheng HungDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Nei-Hui KuoOncology Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Yu-Wen ChengSchool of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Shwu-Jiuan LinSchool of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6961-4890
Zong-You HsiehResearch Center of Health Care Industry Data Science, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chi-Tsun ChengResearch Center of Health Care Industry Data Science, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Min-Huei HsuClinical Data Center, Office of Data Science, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Jason C HsuClinical Data Center, Office of Data Science, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2997-2404
Taipei Medical University · TWTaipei Medical University Hospital · TW

Funding

Taipei Medical University TMU108-AE1-B42Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology MOST110-2321-B-038-003Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology MOST111-2321-B038-005Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology NSTC112-2321-B-038-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study used clinical data to develop a prediction model for breast cancer survival. Breast cancer prognostic factors were explored using machine learning techniques. We conducted a retrospective study using data from the Taipei Medical University Clinical Research Database, which contains electronic medical records from three affiliated hospitals in Taiwan. The study included female patients aged over 20 years who were diagnosed with primary breast cancer and had medical records in hospitals between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2020. The data were divided into training and external testing datasets. Nine different machine learning algorithms were applied to develop the models. The performances of the algorithms were measured using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1-score. A total of 3914 patients were included in the study. The highest AUC of 0.95 was observed with the artificial neural network model (accuracy, 0.90; sensitivity, 0.71; specificity, 0.73; PPV, 0.28; NPV, 0.94; and F1-score, 0.37). Other models showed relatively high AUC, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83. According to the optimal model results, cancer stage, tumor size, diagnosis age, surgery, and body mass index were the most critical factors for predicting breast cancer survival. The study successfully established accurate 5-year survival predictive models for breast cancer. Furthermore, the study found key factors that could affect breast cancer survival in Taiwanese women. Its results might be used as a reference for the clinical practice of breast cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansMachine LearningPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesROC Curvebreast cancer survivalmachine learningprediction modelsreal-world dataTMUCRD

Identifiers

PMID37489252
PMCPMC10551582
OpenAlexW4385231140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.