Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37489195›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Telemedicine Acceptability Among Patients of Primary Health Care Clinics in the Western Region, Saudi Arabia.

Saif A Alzahrani, Jumana H Khouja, Saad A GhamdI, Moteab Alotaybi, Amina Bargawi, Abdullmajeed A Alghamdi, Amer Fayraq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Saif A AlzahraniPreventive Medicine, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, SAU.
Jumana H KhoujaPreventive Medicine, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, SAU.
Saad A GhamdIPreventive Medicine, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, SAU.
Moteab AlotaybiPreventive Medicine, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, SAU.
Amina BargawiPreventive Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, SAU.
Abdullmajeed A AlghamdiPreventive Medicine, Medical Directorate, Saudi Royal Land Forces, Riyadh, SAU.
Amer FayraqPreventive Medicine, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Telemedicine has become increasingly important during recent years. Investigating the acceptability of telemedicine among patients is an important first step in adapting and maintaining the use of telemedicine and gaining the advantages of technologies in daily practice. Objective To measure the acceptability of telemedicine among the patients of primary health care centers (PHCC) using the Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire (SUTAQ) at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Methods This cross-sectional study utilized a validated questionnaire in phone call interviews with patients of PHCC clinics. All patients who had a telemedicine visit at PHCC within the past month of data collection were eligible for inclusion. The SUTAQ tool was used to measure the acceptability of telemedicine technology. Results Out of 365 people selected for participation, 73.9% responded. The study found that the median age was 40 years old with an interquartile range of 30-52. The majority of participants were female (61.1%) and married (86.7%). The median total SUTAQ score was 4.3, out of a maximum score of 6. The medians for SUTAQ subscales were as follows: the perceived benefits score was 5.4, the privacy and discomfort score was 2.1, the health care personnel concerns score was 3, the satisfaction score was 5.7, and the kit as substitution score was 4.3. Patients who had not previously experienced telemedicine visits showed a higher score in "health care personnel concerns" (P-value=0.009), while first-time patients had a higher score in "kit as substitution" (P-value=0.006). Conclusion This study provided positive evidence that telemedicine is an acceptable service among PHCC patients. However, PHCC providers should prioritize patient education and awareness about telemedicine to improve utilization. Addressing privacy, discomfort, and personnel concerns could increase patient satisfaction. Future studies investigating telemedicine utilization can help in understanding its impact on clinical outcome.

Indexed as

healthcare utilizationperceived benefitssatisfactionsutaqtelehealth

Identifiers

PMID37489195
PMCPMC10363371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.