ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2023
Optimizing Sterilization Packaging through Root Cause Analysis: An Exploration into Sealing Defects of Paper-Plastic Pouches.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Root Cause Analysis for Outbreaks of Carbapenem-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Effect of hazard analysis critical control points system in the assembly of reusable medical devices.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Tracing Missing Surgical Specimens: A Quality Improvement Strategy for Adverse Events Based on Root Cause Analysis.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- An action research study of quality improvement in instrument packaging procedures for the central sterile supply department.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paper-plastic sterilization pouches are essential in healthcare for preventing instrument contamination. However, sealing defects in these pouches can jeopardize patient safety. To address this issue, our study uses Root Cause Analysis (RCA), aiming to identify contributing factors to these defects and propose practical solutions. Through this, we aim to enhance the overall sterilization process. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 35,762 instruments sterilized and packaged in paper-plastic pouches at our hospital's Central Sterile Supply Department (CSSD) across two periods: July 2020 to June 2021 (pre-RCA, 17,563 instruments) and September 2021 to August 2022 (post-RCA, 18,199 instruments). We evaluated RCA scores, packaging personnel's perceptions of sealing quality, and sealing defect rates before and after RCA implementation. RESULTS Root causes for sealing defects included lack of a standardized inspection procedure, inadequately sized packing table, missed inspections, incorrect distribution procedures, inadequate staff training, and insufficient lighting through the pass-through window between storage and distribution rooms. Among these, lack of a standardized inspection procedure, small packing table size, and missed inspections were statistically significant risk factors (P<0.05). The sealing defect rate decreased from 0.15% pre-RCA implementation to 0.07% post-RCA implementation. CONCLUSIONS Implementing RCA has been shown to effectively enhance the CSSD staff's perception of sealing quality and significantly reduce the incidence of sealing defects in paper-plastic pouches. Thus, RCA serves as an invaluable tool for quality improvement in sterilization packaging processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.