Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37488874›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2024

Adenosine A

Elisabetta Coppi, Federica Cherchi, Alasdair J Gibb

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elisabetta CoppiDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Federica CherchiDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Alasdair J GibbDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK.
University of Florence · ITUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During brain ischemia, excitotoxicity and peri-infarct depolarization injuries occur and cause cerebral tissue damage. Indeed, anoxic depolarization, consisting of massive neuronal depolarization due to the loss of membrane ion gradients, occurs in vivo or in vitro during an energy failure. The neuromodulator adenosine is released in huge amounts during cerebral ischemia and exerts its effects by activating specific metabotropic receptors, namely: A

Indexed as

adenosine A2Aanoxic depolarizationbrain ischemiaglutamate excitotoxicitymedium spiny neuronsoxygen and glucose deprivationreceptors

Identifiers

PMID37488874
PMCPMC10503621
OpenAlexW4378218346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.