ReviewNeural regeneration research2024
Metabolic and proteostatic differences in quiescent and active neural stem cells.
Review in Neural regeneration research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Unified Framework for Spinal Cord Injury Repair: Metabolic-Nutritional Microenvironment Remodeling, Immune Modulation, and Neural Regeneration.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- The neural stem cell‑NSCLC axis: Molecular drivers, microenvironment crosstalk and emerging therapies (Review).International journal of oncology · 2026Review
- An innovative treatment for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: Silk fibroin nanomaterials improve neural stem cell axon formation and facilitate cognitive improvement.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Review
- Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate promotes proliferation and differentiation of endogenous neural stem cells to repair rat spinal cord injury via the Notch pathway.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- The paradigm shift in neural stem cells basic research driven by artificial intelligence related technologies.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Review
- Decoding brain aging trajectory: predictive discrepancies, genetic susceptibilities, and emerging therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Review
- Molecular mechanisms of cellular metabolic homeostasis in stem cells.International journal of oral science · 2023Review
- Proteomic profiling reveals mitochondrial metabolic alterations in dexamethasone-induced neuronal differentiation.Science progressArticle
- A Reversible Neural Stem Cell Quiescence and Activation Culture System for Metabolic Study.Cell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adult neural stem cells are neurogenesis progenitor cells that play an important role in neurogenesis. Therefore, neural regeneration may be a promising target for treatment of many neurological illnesses. The regenerative capacity of adult neural stem cells can be characterized by two states: quiescent and active. Quiescent adult neural stem cells are more stable and guarantee the quantity and quality of the adult neural stem cell pool. Active adult neural stem cells are characterized by rapid proliferation and differentiation into neurons which allow for integration into neural circuits. This review focuses on differences between quiescent and active adult neural stem cells in nutrition metabolism and protein homeostasis. Furthermore, we discuss the physiological significance and underlying advantages of these differences. Due to the limited number of adult neural stem cells studies, we referred to studies of embryonic adult neural stem cells or non-mammalian adult neural stem cells to evaluate specific mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.