Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37488597›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2023

Assessing synchronous ovarian metastasis in gastric cancer patients using a clinical-radiomics nomogram based on baseline abdominal contrast-enhanced CT: a two-center study.

Qian-Wen Zhang, Pan-Pan Yang, Yong-Jun-Yi Gao, Zhi-Hui Li, Yuan Yuan, Si-Jie Li, Shao-Feng Duan, Cheng-Wei Shao, Qiang Hao, Yong Lu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Qian-Wen Zhang *Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, The Navy Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Pan-Pan Yang *Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, The Navy Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Yong-Jun-Yi GaoDepartment of Emergency, the Eighth Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, 17 Heishanhu Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100091, China.
Zhi-Hui LiDepartment of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital Luwan Branch, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yuan YuanDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, The Navy Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Si-Jie LiDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, The Navy Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Shao-Feng DuanGE Healthcare China, Pudong New Town, No.1 Huatuo Road, Shanghai, 210000, China.
Cheng-Wei ShaoDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, The Navy Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Qiang HaoDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, The Navy Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Yong LuDepartment of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital Luwan Branch, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qi Chen *Department of Health Statistics, The Navy Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China. cqchenqi1989@163.com.
Fu Shen *Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, The Navy Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China. ssff_53@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8596-9563
Second Military Medical University · CNRuijin Hospital · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CNShanghai Medical Information Center · CN

Funding

Guhai Project of Changhai hospital GH145-09Initial Foundation for Young Scientists of Changhai hospital #2020QNB01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo build and validate a radiomics nomogram based on preoperative CT scans and clinical data for detecting synchronous ovarian metastasis (SOM) in female gastric cancer (GC) cases.

methodsPathologically confirmed GC cases in 2 cohorts were retrospectively enrolled. All cases had presurgical abdominal contrast-enhanced CT and pelvis contrast-enhanced MRI and pathological examinations for any suspicious ovarian lesions detected by MRI. Cohort 1 cases (n = 101) were included as the training set. Radiomics features were obtained to develop a radscore. A nomogram combining the radscore and clinical factors was built to detect SOM. The bootstrap method was carried out in cohort 1 as internal validation. External validation was carried out in cohort 2 (n = 46). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, decision curve analysis (DCA) and the confusion matrix were utilized to assess the performances of the radscore, nomogram and subjective evaluation model.

resultsThe nomogram, which combined age and the radscore, displayed a higher AUC than the radscore and subjective evaluation (0.910 vs 0.827 vs 0.773) in the training cohort. In the external validation cohort, the nomogram also had a higher AUC than the radscore and subjective evaluation (0.850 vs 0.790 vs 0.675). DCA and the confusion matrix confirmed the nomogram was superior to the radscore in both cohorts.

conclusionsThis pilot study showed that a nomogram model combining the radscore and clinical characteristics is useful in detecting SOM in female GC cases. It may be applied to improve clinical treatment and is superior to subjective evaluation or the radscore alone.

Indexed as

Ovarian CystsOvarian NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsFemaleHumansNomogramsPilot ProjectsRetrospective StudiesCTGastric cancerRadiomicsSynchronous ovarian metastasis

Identifiers

PMID37488597
PMCPMC10367237
OpenAlexW4385188805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.