Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37488591›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive care2023

The Restrictive Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy for Critically Injured Patients (RESTRIC) trial: a cluster-randomized, crossover, non-inferiority multicenter trial of restrictive transfusion in trauma.

Mineji Hayakawa, Takashi Tagami, Daisuke Kudo, Kota Ono, Makoto Aoki, Akira Endo, Tetsuya Yumoto, Yosuke Matsumura, Shiho Irino, Kazuhiko Sekine and 20 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Blood transfusion strategies for major bleeding in trauma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Effect of head injury on blood transfusion requirements in severe trauma: a post-hoc analysis of the RESTRIC trial.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Red-cell Transfusion Strategy Dilemma in Critically Ill Patients in ICU: Is Restrictive or Liberal the Answer?Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Is Vesicular Therapy the Newcomer That Matters for the Medicine of Tomorrow?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Mineji HayakawaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hokkaido University Hospital, N14W5 Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8648, Japan. mineji@dream.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8341-7626
Takashi TagamiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan.
Daisuke KudoDivision of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kota OnoOno Biostat Consulting, Tokyo, Japan.
Makoto AokiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Akira EndoDepartment of Acute Critical Care and Disaster Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuya YumotoDepartment of Emergency, Critical Care, and Disaster Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Yosuke MatsumuraDepartment of Intensive Care, Chiba Emergency Medical Centre, Chiba, Japan.
Shiho IrinoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhiko SekineDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Noritaka UshioDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Japan Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Japan.
Takayuki OguraDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, Tochigi Prefectural Emergency and Critical Care Centre, Imperial Gift Foundation Saiseikai, Utsunomiya Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Sho NachiAdvanced Critical Care Centre, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan.
Yuhei IrieDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Katsura HayakawaAdvanced Emergency and Critical Care Centre, Saitama Red Cross Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Yusuke ItoSenri Critical Care Medical Centre, Saiseikai Senri Hospital, Suita, Japan.
Yuko OkishioDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Tomohiro MuronoiDepartment of Acute Care Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Japan.
Yoshinori KosakiDepartment of Emergency, Critical Care, and Disaster Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Kaori ItoDepartment of Surgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Keita NakatsutsumiTrauma and Acute Critical Care Centre, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaka KondoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Japan.
Taichiro UedaShock and Trauma Centre, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Inzai, Japan.
Hiroshi FukumaSenshu Trauma and Critical Care Centre, Rinku General Medical Centre, Izumisano, Japan.
Yuichi SaisakaEmergency and Critical Care Centre, Kochi Health Sciences Centre, Kochi, Japan.
Naoki TominagaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeo KuritaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Fumihiko NakayamaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School Tama Nagayama Hospital, Tama, Japan.
Tomotaka ShibataAdvanced Trauma, Emergency and Critical Care Centre, Oita University Hospital, Yufu, Japan.
Shigeki KushimotoDivision of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Nippon Medical School · JPOkayama University · JPSaiseikai Central Hospital · JPTohoku University · JPChiba Hokusou Hospital · JPChiba University · JPFukuoka University Hospital · JPGifu University Hospital · JPGunma University · JPHokkaido University Hospital · JPJuntendo University Urayasu Hospital · JPMaebashi Red Cross Hospital · JPNippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital · JPOita University Hospital · JPSaiseikaisenri Hospital · JPSaiseikai Utsunomiya hospital · JPSaitama Red Cross Hospital · JPShimane University · JPTeikyo University · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacies of fresh frozen plasma and coagulation factor transfusion have been widely evaluated in trauma-induced coagulopathy management during the acute post-injury phase. However, the efficacy of red blood cell transfusion has not been adequately investigated in patients with severe trauma, and the optimal hemoglobin target level during the acute post-injury and resuscitation phases remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to examine whether a restrictive transfusion strategy was clinically non-inferior to a liberal transfusion strategy during the acute post-injury phase.

methodsThis cluster-randomized, crossover, non-inferiority multicenter trial was conducted at 22 tertiary emergency medical institutions in Japan and included adult patients with severe trauma at risk of major bleeding. The institutions were allocated a restrictive or liberal transfusion strategy (target hemoglobin levels: 7-9 or 10-12 g/dL, respectively). The strategies were applied to patients immediately after arrival at the emergency department. The primary outcome was 28-day survival after arrival at the emergency department. Secondary outcomes included transfusion volume, complication rates, and event-free days. The non-inferiority margin was set at 3%.

resultsThe 28-day survival rates of patients in the restrictive (n = 216) and liberal (n = 195) strategy groups were 92.1% and 91.3%, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio for 28-day survival in the restrictive versus liberal strategy group was 1.02 (95% confidence interval: 0.49-2.13). Significant non-inferiority was not observed. Transfusion volumes and hemoglobin levels were lower in the restrictive strategy group than in the liberal strategy group. No between-group differences were noted in complication rates or event-free days.

conclusionsAlthough non-inferiority of the restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategy for 28-day survival was not statistically significant, the mortality and complication rates were similar between the groups. The restrictive transfusion strategy results in a lower transfusion volume. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: umin.ac.jp/ctr: UMIN000034405, registration date: 8 October 2018.

Indexed as

HemoglobinRed blood cellResuscitationTransfusionTrauma

Identifiers

PMID37488591
PMCPMC10364403
OpenAlexW4385202814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.