Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37488566›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2023

Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation to promote extubation success in critically ill adults on intensive care: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial.

Ema Swingwood, Sarah Voss, Lyvonne N Tume, Jeremy Bewley, Nicholas Turner, George Ntoumenopoulos, Louise Rose, Fiona Cramp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ema SwingwoodFaculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK. Ema.Swingwood@uwe.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1507-6748
Sarah VossFaculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Lyvonne N TumeFaculty of Health, Social Care & Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.
Jeremy BewleyDepartment of Intensive Care, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Nicholas TurnerBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
George NtoumenopoulosDepartment of Physiotherapy, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Louise RoseFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.
Fiona CrampFaculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
University of the West of England · GBEdge Hill University · GBKing's College London · GBSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · AUUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR300504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtubation failure, defined as reintubation within 48 h, is associated with increased intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and higher mortality risk. One cause of extubation failure is secretion retention, resulting from an inability to cough effectively. Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) simulates a cough aiding secretion clearance. However, MI-E is not routinely used in the ICU for invasively ventilated patients. This study aims to determine feasibility and acceptability of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) examining MI-E use to promote extubation success in intubated, ventilated adults.

methodsIt is a single-centre, feasibility RCT with semi-structured interviews, economic scoping, and exploratory physiology study. The feasibility RCT (n = 50) will compare standard care to a MI-E protocol including a minimum of two MI-E sessions via the endotracheal tube prior to extubation. Post-extubation, MI-E will be delivered via facemask or mouthpiece up to two times/day for 48 h. MI-E settings will be individualised. All patients will receive standard care (no MI-E) in relation to mechanical ventilation, weaning, rehabilitation, physiotherapy techniques such as positioning, manual airway clearance techniques, manual/ventilator hyperinflation, endotracheal suctioning, and nebulisation. Clinical data collection will occur before, on completion, and 5-min post-physiotherapy sessions (intervention/control arms). Resource use will be calculated for each 24-h period. Analyses will be descriptive and address feasibility outcomes including participant recruitment and attrition, proportion of MI-E treatment sessions completed, dataset completeness, and frequency of adverse events and acceptability. Semi-structured online interviews informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) with patients, clinicians, and family members will explore the acceptability of the MI-E intervention and study processes. Interview data will be analysed using reflexive thematic analysis based on TFA domains through first-level coding. The embedded physiology study will use electrical impedance tomography and lung ultrasound to explore lung recruitment and de-recruitment during MI-E in a subset of 5-10 patients. DISCUSSION: This study will examine feasibility and acceptability of a RCT protocol of MI-E to promote extubation success. Study findings will inform design modification and conduct of a future adequately powered trial. Furthermore, the study will contribute and advance the understanding of MI-E use in critically ill intubated adults.

trial registrationISRCTN 24603037; IRAS 303674.

Indexed as

Airway clearanceCough assistElectrical impedance tomographyExtubation failureICUPhysiotherapyVentilator weaning

Identifiers

PMID37488566
PMCPMC10364411
OpenAlexW4385226827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.