Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37488481›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2023

The WUR0000125 PRRS resilience SNP had no apparent effect on pigs' infectivity and susceptibility in a novel transmission trial.

Margo Chase-Topping, Graham Plastow, Jack Dekkers, Yanhua Li, Ying Fang, Volker Gerdts, Jill Van Kessel, John Harding, Tanja Opriessnig, Andrea Doeschl-Wilson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Margo Chase-ToppingThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Roslin, Edinburgh, UK. margo.chase@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4668-333X
Graham PlastowDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Jack DekkersDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Yanhua LiDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Ying FangDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Volker GerdtsVaccine and Infectious Disease Organization-International Vaccine Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Jill Van KesselVaccine and Infectious Disease Organization-International Vaccine Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
John HardingDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Tanja OpriessnigVaccines and Diagnostics Department, Moredun Research Institute, Penicuik, UK.
Andrea Doeschl-WilsonThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Roslin, Edinburgh, UK.
University of Saskatchewan · CAIowa State University · USRoslin Institute · GBKansas State University · USUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council /30002275Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20002172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPorcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) remains one of the most important infectious diseases for the pig industry. A novel small-scale transmission experiment was designed to assess whether the WUR0000125 (WUR for Wageningen University and Research) PRRS resilience single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) confers lower susceptibility and infectivity to pigs under natural porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV-2) transmission.

methodsCommercial full- and half-sib piglets (n = 164) were assigned as either Inoculation, Shedder, or Contact pigs. Pigs were grouped according to their relatedness structure and WUR genotype, with R- and R+ referring to pigs with zero and one copy of the dominant WUR resilience allele, respectively. Barcoding of the PRRSV-2 strain (SD09-200) was applied to track pig genotype-specific transmission. Blood and nasal swab samples were collected and concentrations of PRRSV-2 were determined by quantitative (q)-PCR and cell culture and expressed in units of median tissue culture infectious dose (TCID

resultsAll Shedder and Contact pigs, except one, became infected through natural transmission. There was no significant (p > 0.05) effect of Contact pig genotype on any virus measures that would indicate WUR genotype differences in susceptibility. Contact pigs tended to have higher serum AUC (p = 0.017) and log

conclusionsThe novel design demonstrated that it is possible to estimate genotype effects on Shedder pig infectivity and Contact pig susceptibility that are not confounded by family effects. The study, however, provided no supportive evidence that genetic selection on WUR genotype would affect PRRSV-2 transmission. The results of this study need to be independently validated in a larger trial using different PRRSV strains before dismissing the effects of the WUR marker or the previously detected GBP5 gene on PRRSV transmission.

Indexed as

Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory SyndromePorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusAnimalsGenotypeLinear ModelsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSwine

Identifiers

PMID37488481
PMCPMC10364427
OpenAlexW4385210559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.