SynthesisJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2023
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Obesity: a Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- What is Weight Loss after Bariatric Surgery Expressed in Percentage Total Weight Loss (%TWL)? An Updated Systematic Review.Obesity surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Primary and Revisional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Systematic Review and GRADE-Based IFSO Position Statement.Obesity surgery · 2026Pooled it
- EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF OBESITY: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Management of Recurrent Weight Gain After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Comparative Effectiveness of Conversion Procedures Versus Obesity Management Medications.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Anemia Following One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Comparative Study of Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and the Risk of De Novo or Persistent Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- One-anastomosis gastric bypassWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Article
- One-anastomosis gastric bypassWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB): a scoping review.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Which Procedure Yields Better Outcomes: Sleeve Gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass or Mini Gastric Bypass? Seven Years Outcome Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Integrated Insights into Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: Improving Life Quality and Reducing Mortality in Obesity.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Five-Year BAROS Score Outcomes for Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass, and Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Comparative Study.Obesity surgery · 2024Article
- The Relationship between Depressive Symptoms, Quality of Life and miRNAs 8 Years after Bariatric Surgery.Nutrients · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA long-lasting and efficient method of managing obesity and therapeutic associated comorbidities is bariatric surgery. However, a debated comparison between one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and sleeve gastrectomy is still essential (SG). The goal of this study is to evaluate outcomes using RCT and NRCT from 2015 to 2022.
methodsBy contrasting the OAGB and SG for bariatric surgery from January 2015 to September 2022, an RCT and NRCT were prospectively gathered using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE databases of published research. This meta-statistical analysis was carried out in RevMan 5.4, and the best effect model was selected based on heterogeneity.
resultsTwelve retrospective studies describing 6344 patients (3725 OAGB and 2619 SG) satisfied the inclusion criteria. A statistically significant result was in %EWL first year (MD = 8.03, 95% CI: 4.54-11.52, P < 0.05), second year (MD = 8.94, 95% CI: 2.95-14.94, P < 0.05), third year (MD = 8.93, 95% CI: 5.75-12.10, P < 0.05), fourth year (MD = 15.09, 95% CI:0.87-29.31, P < 0.05), and fifth year (MD = 14.25, 95% CI: 5.34, P < 0.05). OAGB was associated with a lower rate of remission in dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hemorrhage. However, OAGB increased the incidence of GERD and leakage.
conclusionsIn terms of weight loss and comorbidity remission, OAGB is more effective than SG, although postoperative consequences are rather comparable between the two methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.