Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37488394›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgical oncology2023

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A National Cohort Study.

Gabriella N Tortorello, Eric H Li, Cimarron E Sharon, Kevin L Ma, Robert G Maki, John T Miura, Douglas L Fraker, Ronald P DeMatteo, Giorgos C Karakousis

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Leiomyosarcoma Therapeutic Approaches and Future Directions.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriella N TortorelloDivision of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Gabriella.tortorello@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1836-6612
Eric H LiPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Cimarron E SharonDivision of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kevin L MaDivision of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Robert G MakiDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
John T MiuraDivision of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Douglas L FrakerDivision of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ronald P DeMatteoDivision of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Giorgos C KarakousisDivision of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionManagement of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) remains controversial, with the mainstay of treatment being surgery. While neoadjuvant radiation demonstrated no improvement in recurrence-free survival in a prospective randomized trial (STRASS), the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) remains unknown and is the subject of ongoing study (STRASS2).

methodsPatients who underwent surgical resection of high-grade RP leiomyosarcoma (LMS) or dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS) were identified from the National Cancer Database (2006-2019). Predictors of NCT were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Differences in 5-year survival were examined using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and by Cox proportional hazard modeling.

resultsA total of 2656 patients met inclusion criteria. Fifty-seven percent of patients had DDLS and 43.5% had LMS. Six percent of patients underwent NCT. Patients who received NCT were younger (median age 60 vs 64 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to have LMS (OR 1.4, p = 0.04). In comparing NCT with no-NCT patients, there was no difference in 5-year overall survival (OS) on KM analysis (57.3% vs 52.8%, p = 0.38), nor was any difference seen after propensity matching (54.9% vs 49.1%, p = 0.48, N = 144 per group). When stratified by histology, there was no difference in OS based on receipt of NCT (LMS: 59.8% for NCT group, 56.6% for no-NCT, p = 0.34; DDLS: 54.2% for NCT group, 50.1% for no-NCT, p = 0.99).

conclusionIn patients undergoing surgical resection of RP LMS or DDLS, NCT does not appear to confer an OS advantage. Prospective randomized data from STRASS2 will confirm or refute these retrospective data.

Indexed as

LeiomyosarcomaRetroperitoneal NeoplasmsSarcomaSoft Tissue NeoplasmsCohort StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisProspective StudiesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37488394
OpenAlexW4385209921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.