ArticleSpinal cord2023
Performance of the Dutch clinical prediction rule for the ambulation outcome after spinal cord injury in a middle-income country clinical setting: an external validation study in the Thai retrospective cohort.
Article in Spinal cord, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo perform external geographic and domain validation of the clinical prediction rule (CPR) of the ambulation outcome of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) originally developed by van Middendorp, et al. (2011) in Thais with traumatic and non-traumatic SCI. STUDY
designRetrospective cohort study.
settingA tertiary rehabilitation facility in Chiang Mai, Thailand.
methodsA validation data set, including predictive (age and four neurological variables) and outcome (ambulation status) parameters was retrospectively collected from medical records of patients with traumatic and non-traumatic SCI admitted between December 2007 and December 2019. The performance of the original model was evaluated in both discrimination and calibration aspects, using an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (auROC) and calibration curves, respectively.
resultsThree hundred and thirty-three patients with SCI were included in the validation set. The prevalence of ambulators was 59% (197 of 333 participants). An auROC of 0.93 (95% CI 0.90-0.96) indicated excellent discrimination whereas the calibration curve demonstrated underestimation, especially in patients with AIS grade D. Performance of the CPR was decreased but acceptable in patients with non-traumatic SCI.
conclusionsOur external validation study demonstrated excellent discrimination but slightly underestimated calibration of the CPR of ambulation outcome after SCI. Regardless of the geographic and etiologic background of the population, the Dutch CPR could be applied to predict the ambulation outcome in patients with SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.