Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37488314›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024

How Camera-to-Subject Distance and Height Affect Breast Measurement and Follow-Up Assessment in Plastic Surgery.

Jiangmiao Xie, Wenchao Zhang, Elan Yang, Nanze Yu, Zenan Xia, Xiaoli Liu, Yaning Xie, Sichao Chen, Ang Zeng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jiangmiao XieDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Shuaifuyuan 1#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Wenchao ZhangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Shuaifuyuan 1#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Elan YangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Shuaifuyuan 1#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Nanze YuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Shuaifuyuan 1#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Zenan XiaDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Shuaifuyuan 1#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Xiaoli LiuDepartment of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yaning XieSouth China Normal University Academy of Fine Arts, Guangzhou, China.
Sichao ChenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Shuaifuyuan 1#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Ang ZengDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Shuaifuyuan 1#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. zenga@pumch.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-4680-7099
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNBeijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University · CNSouth China Normal University · CN

Funding

Medical and Health Science Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences No. 2021-I2M-1-068National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2022-PUMCH-B-040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to several factors that affect photograph quality, bias is inevitably present in two-dimensional (2D) breast photography. The principal variables affecting image performance at a fixed focus length are the distance between the camera and the subjects and the photography angles.

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the effects of camera-to-subject distances and camera height on breast measurement parameters to understand the trend of breast deformation and provide guidance for the accurate evaluation of planar follow-up.

methodsWe enlisted 16 volunteers with various breast cup sizes (A-D). Frontal and lateral photos were obtained with a steady focus of 50 mm at distances between 1.10 m and 2.20 m and at heights between 30 cm above the nipple and 30 cm below the nipple at intervals of 10 cm. Two researchers independently evaluated each volunteer's breast aesthetic parameters, including 11 linear parameters, 3 area parameters, and 3 ratio parameters, using Vernier calipers and Photoshop.

resultsThe correlation coefficient of the two investigators ranged from 0.922 to 0.999. The results measured by Photoshop were 29.67 ± 5.23% greater than those of the Vernier caliper (p < 0.01). In contrast to ratio parameters, which showed no significant changes in each distance group (p = 1.00), linear parameters and area parameters significantly increased as object distance decreased (p < 0.05). The lower pole of the breast grew wider and flatter and occupied a larger proportion of the breast as height declined.

conclusionCamera-to-subject distances of 1.5-1.7 m are recommended for stabilized and uniform breast photography. Varying shooting height affects breast distortion. Quantifying the relationship between photographic conditions and breast morphology enables plastic surgeons to conduct more comprehensive and accurate assessments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. Bullet point list: 1. The breast morphology will get more distortion with a smaller camera-to-subject distance. 2. Camera-to-subject distances of 1.5~1.7m are recommended for stabilized and uniform breast photography. 3. Height rather than distance affects the breast proportion.

Indexed as

BreastMammaplastyPhotographySurgery, PlasticAdultEstheticsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealthy VolunteersHumansYoung AdultBreast measurementBreast morphology distortionCamera-to-subject distanceMedical photographyPhotographic height

Identifiers

PMID37488314
OpenAlexW4385190483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.