ArticleNPJ precision oncology2023
Deep learning predicts patients outcome and mutations from digitized histology slides in gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Precision therapeutic strategies for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- Deep Learning Predicts Mutations and Outcomes in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.Cancer research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Molecular Biomarker Identification in Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- [Current status and challenges of artificial intelligence and organoid technologies in precision diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026Review
- Prediction of Mutations and Outcome in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors with Deep Learning: A Multicenter, Multinational Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Review
- PathQC: Determining Molecular and Structural Integrity of Tissues from Histopathological Slides.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prognostic prediction in soft-tissue sarcomas using deep learning and digital pathology of tumor and margin areas.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Lightweight Machine Learning Model for High Precision Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Identification.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Convergence of evolving artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques in precision oncology.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Development and interpretation of a multimodal predictive model for prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor.NPJ precision oncology · 2024Article
- Review
- KIT mutations and expression: current knowledge and new insights for overcoming IM resistance in GIST.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Risk assessment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) according to the AFIP/Miettinen classification and mutational profiling are major tools for patient management. However, the AFIP/Miettinen classification depends heavily on mitotic counts, which is laborious and sometimes inconsistent between pathologists. It has also been shown to be imperfect in stratifying patients. Molecular testing is costly and time-consuming, therefore, not systematically performed in all countries. New methods to improve risk and molecular predictions are hence crucial to improve the tailoring of adjuvant therapy. We have built deep learning (DL) models on digitized HES-stained whole slide images (WSI) to predict patients' outcome and mutations. Models were trained with a cohort of 1233 GIST and validated on an independent cohort of 286 GIST. DL models yielded comparable results to the Miettinen classification for relapse-free-survival prediction in localized GIST without adjuvant Imatinib (C-index=0.83 in cross-validation and 0.72 for independent testing). DL splitted Miettinen intermediate risk GIST into high/low-risk groups (p value = 0.002 in the training set and p value = 0.29 in the testing set). DL models achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.81, 0.91, and 0.71 for predicting mutations in KIT, PDGFRA and wild type, respectively, in cross-validation and 0.76, 0.90, and 0.55 in independent testing. Notably, PDGFRA exon18 D842V mutation, which is resistant to Imatinib, was predicted with an AUC of 0.87 and 0.90 in cross-validation and independent testing, respectively. Additionally, novel histological criteria predictive of patients' outcome and mutations were identified by reviewing the tiles selected by the models. As a proof of concept, our study showed the possibility of implementing DL with digitized WSI and may represent a reproducible way to improve tailoring therapy and precision medicine for patients with GIST.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.