ReviewBritish journal of haematology2023
Challenges and solutions to superior chimeric antigen receptor-T design and deployment for B-cell lymphomas.
Review in British journal of haematology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunological barriers and engineering strategies for CAR-T cell therapy in acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Multi-antigen chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory B cell lymphomas.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Microbiota-derived metabolic priming of CAR-T cell fitness: a translational framework for next-generation cell therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Real-world insights into genomic reprogramming during CAR-T cell manufacturing in India.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- A SWOT-Consensus for CAR-T in Follicular Lymphoma: Fine Tuning of Patient Journey and Selection.Hematological oncology · 2025Article
- Expanding the Therapeutic Reach of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells and Bispecific T-Cell Engagers Across Solid Tumors.JCO precision oncology · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Anti-CAR Linker mAbs for CAR T Monitoring after BiTEs/bsAbs and CAR T-Cell Pretreatment.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- The shifting therapeutic paradigm for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma.Leukemia research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) therapies represent a major breakthrough in cancer medicine, given the ex vivo-based technology that harnesses the power of one's own immune system. These therapeutics have demonstrated remarkable success for relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas. Although more than a decade has passed since the initial introduction of CAR-T therapeutics for patients with leukaemia and lymphoma, there is still significant debate as to where CAR-T therapeutics fit into the management paradigm, as consensus guidelines are limited. Competing interventions deployed in subsequent lines of therapy for aggressive lymphoma include novel targeted agents, bispecific antibodies, and time-honoured stem cell transplant. In this focused review, we discuss the major obstacles to advancing the therapeutic reach for CAR-T products in early lines of therapy. Such barriers include antigen escape, "cold" tumour microenvironments, host inflammation and CAR-T cell exhaustion. We highlight solutions including point-of-care CAR-T manufacturing and early T lymphopheresis. We review the evidence basis for early CAR-T deployment for B-cell lymphomas in light of the recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of three first-in-class anti-CD3/CD20 bispecific antibodies-mosunetuzumab, epcoritamab and glofitamab. We propose practical recommendations for 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.