Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37488010›Full record

ArticleBiochimica et biophysica acta. General subjects2023

Quantitative assessment of ligand bias from bias plots: The bias coefficient "kappa".

Kelly Karl, Sudarshan Rajagopal, Kalina Hristova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochimica et biophysica acta. General subjects, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kelly KarlInstitute for NanoBioTechnology, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and Program in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America.
Sudarshan RajagopalDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, United States of America.
Kalina HristovaInstitute for NanoBioTechnology, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and Program in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America. Electronic address: kh@jhu.edu.

Funding

Program of Molecular BiophysicsT32GM135131 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Karen G. Fleming · 2020 to 2026
$5.4M
Seeking the Physical Basis of AchondroplasiaR01GM068619 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HRISTOVA, KALINA · 2004 to 2022
$5.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM068619NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM135131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current methods for quantifying ligand bias involve the construction of bias plots and the calculations of bias coefficients that can be compared using statistical methods. However, widely used bias coefficients can diverge in their abilities to identify ligand bias and can give false positives. As the empirical bias plots are considered the most reliable tools in bias identification, here we develop an analytical description of bias plot trajectories and introduce a bias coefficient, kappa, which is calculated from these trajectories. The new bias coefficient complements the tool-set in ligand bias identification in cell signaling research.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionBiasLigandsLigandsLigand biasMembrane receptorSignaling

Identifiers

PMID37488010
PMCPMC10528940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.